public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Cc: balbi@ti.com, "'Grant Likely'" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	"'Linus Walleij'" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: use pr_* instead of printk
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:48:01 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504EDEA1.1050108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002201cd8fe8$2aafa070$800ee150$%han@samsung.com>

On 11/09/12 16:39, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 3:31 PM Felipe Balbi wrote
> 
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:59:11PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
>>> This patch uses pr_* instead of printk.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c |    6 +++---
>>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
>>> index ba126cc..e38d990 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
>>> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
>>>  #ifndef DEBUG_GPIO
>>>  #define gpio_dbg(x...) do { } while (0)
>>>  #else
>>> -#define gpio_dbg(x...) printk(KERN_DEBUG x)
>>> +#define gpio_dbg(x...) pr_debug(x)
>>>  #endif
>>>
>>>  int samsung_gpio_setpull_updown(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
>>> @@ -926,10 +926,10 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip)
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>>>  	if (chip->pm != NULL) {
>>>  		if (!chip->pm->save || !chip->pm->resume)
>>> -			printk(KERN_ERR "gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n",
>>> +			pr_err("gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n",
>>>  			       gc->label);
>>
>> I would rather see dev_* conversion instead.
>>
>> my 2 cents
> 
> Hi Felipe Balbi,
> 
> OK, I will replace printk(KERN_ERR...) with dev_err.
> Thank you.

I was going to suggest that also, but I don't think that there is a dev
pointer to use. The gpio_chip structure has an optional one, but from my
quick glance it didn't look like the Samsung driver was using it. I
could be wrong though. If I am, go with dev_err (and dev_dbg for
replacing the gpio_dbg statements).

~Ryan






  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-11  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-10 11:59 [PATCH] gpio: samsung: use pr_* instead of printk Jingoo Han
2012-09-11  6:08 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-09-11  6:35   ` Jingoo Han
2012-09-11  6:30 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-09-11  6:39   ` Jingoo Han
2012-09-11  6:48     ` Ryan Mallon [this message]
2012-09-11  7:02       ` Jingoo Han
2012-09-11 11:57         ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504EDEA1.1050108@gmail.com \
    --to=rmallon@gmail.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox