From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758022Ab2IKJiB (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:38:01 -0400 Received: from eu1sys200aog105.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.119]:58498 "EHLO eu1sys200aog105.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756781Ab2IKJh7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:37:59 -0400 Message-ID: <504EFE6D.3090901@stericsson.com> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:03:41 +0200 From: Ola Lilja User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , STEricsson_nomadik_linux , Linus WALLEIJ , "arnd@arndb.de" , "broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" , Roger NILSSON1 , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] ASoC: Ux500: Minor coding layout changes References: <1345816913-4113-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1345816913-4113-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120910164448.GD24506@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120910164448.GD24506@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/10/2012 06:44 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > Ola poke. > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 03:01:41PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >> Includes removal of duplicate debug print affirming entry into >> the probe function, an unnecessary line break of a coding line >> <80 chars and a white space change (unintentional tab). >> >> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones >> --- >> sound/soc/ux500/mop500.c | 7 ++----- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/sound/soc/ux500/mop500.c b/sound/soc/ux500/mop500.c >> index 6840df7..356611d 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/ux500/mop500.c >> +++ b/sound/soc/ux500/mop500.c >> @@ -88,8 +88,6 @@ static int __devinit mop500_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; >> int ret; >> >> - pr_debug("%s: Enter.\n", __func__); >> - >> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s: Enter.\n", __func__); >> >> mop500_card.dev = &pdev->dev; >> @@ -117,8 +115,7 @@ static int __devinit mop500_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> ret = snd_soc_register_card(&mop500_card); >> if (ret) >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, >> - "Error: snd_soc_register_card failed (%d)!\n", >> - ret); >> + "Error: snd_soc_register_card failed (%d)!\n", ret); >> >> return ret; >> } >> @@ -131,7 +128,7 @@ static int __devexit mop500_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> >> snd_soc_unregister_card(mop500_card); >> mop500_ab8500_remove(mop500_card); >> - >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> > Nothing to say about this one. Looks OK.