Re: [PATCH] amd64_edac: Memory size reported double on processor family 0Fh

[Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>]

[fixing lkml address]

On 09/11/2012 05:52 PM, Josh Hunt wrote:
> With recent kernels we noticed that edac was reporting double the memory size on
> systems running with AMD family 0Fh processors. I'm not very familiar with the
> code, but this resolves it from what I can see on my systems. At least in
> amd64_debug_display_dimm_sizes() and k8_dbam_to_chip_select() there appeared
> to be redundant shifts to the left by 1 when WIDTH_128 is present.
>
> thanks
> Josh
>
> ---
>
> Since commit 41d8bfaba70311c2fa0666554ef160ea8ffc9daf the memory size reported
> by edac has been double. Adding to the shift if WIDTH_128 is set looks to be
> redundant, removing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
> ---
>   drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c |    2 +-
>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> index 5a297a2..c796710 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ static int k8_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
>
>   	if (pvt->ext_model >= K8_REV_F) {
>   		WARN_ON(cs_mode > 11);
> -		return ddr2_cs_size(cs_mode, dclr & WIDTH_128);
> +		return ddr2_cs_size(cs_mode, 0);
>   	}
>   	else if (pvt->ext_model >= K8_REV_D) {
>   		unsigned diff;
>