From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: eranian@google.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu,
andi@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] perf tool: Allow wildcard in PMU name
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:30:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504FE5AB.4060406@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120911140549.GC3800@krava.brq.redhat.com>
On 09/11/2012 10:05 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:53:51PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
>>
>
> SNIP
>
>> +int parse_events_add_pmu(struct list_head **_list, int *idx,
>> char *name, struct list_head *head_config)
>> {
>> struct perf_event_attr attr;
>> - struct perf_pmu *pmu;
>> + struct list_head *list;
>> + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
>> + struct perf_evsel *evsel, *first = NULL;
>> + int orig_idx = *idx;
>>
>> - pmu = perf_pmu__find(name);
>> - if (!pmu)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + list = malloc(sizeof(*list));
>> + if (!list)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(list);
>
> list should be allocated only if (!*_list)) same as in add_event function
>
> I haven't test, but I think you'll leak/loose events if there's another pmu
> event defined after ','
>
I think *_list is always NULL, because the code in parse-event.y is:
---
PE_NAME '/' event_config '/'
{
struct parse_events_data__events *data = _data;
struct list_head *list = NULL;
ABORT_ON(parse_events_add_pmu(&list, &data->idx, $1, $3));
parse_events__free_terms($3);
$$ = list;
}
---
Regards
Yan, Zheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-12 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 7:53 [RFC PATCH 1/3] perf: Add cpumask for uncore pmu Yan, Zheng
2012-09-10 7:53 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] perf/x86: " Yan, Zheng
2012-09-19 15:26 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Yan, Zheng
2012-09-10 7:53 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] perf tool: Make perf-stat check PMU cpumask file Yan, Zheng
2012-09-19 15:26 ` [tip:perf/core] perf stat: Check " tip-bot for Yan, Zheng
2012-09-10 7:53 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] perf tool: Allow wildcard in PMU name Yan, Zheng
2012-09-11 13:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-09-11 14:05 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-09-12 1:30 ` Yan, Zheng [this message]
2012-09-12 9:03 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-09-11 14:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-09-17 15:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-09-18 3:11 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-09-10 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] perf: Add cpumask for uncore pmu Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-10 23:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504FE5AB.4060406@intel.com \
--to=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox