From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@ti.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:32:35 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504FE633.2090304@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347375033.27206.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
On 12/09/12 00:50, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 16:44 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 09/10/2012 02:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> OK, that's what I'd thought was going on - it was the fact that you'd
>>>> just acked the patch rather than asked for it to go to the patch tracker
>>>> or something which made me wonder if things had changed.
>>>
>>> I kind'a forgot because it's been soo long since I took any of those
>>> patches...
>>
>> Ok, what's the plan? Should I add this patch to the patch tracker?
>
> I'd propose to send it to Linus for v3.6 even.
If we do this can we make a decision quickly on it.
I need to fix a regression on some ColdFire parts for 3.6. I either need
to use this clk patch, which fixes my problem, or a specific patch for the
ColdFire clk code http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134725225823437&w=2
Regards
Greg
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-12 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-09 15:01 [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-09-09 20:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-09 23:50 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-10 0:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-10 0:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-10 0:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-11 14:44 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-09-11 14:50 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-09-12 1:32 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2012-09-12 20:43 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-09-15 21:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-16 0:15 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-18 8:00 ` Thierry Reding
2012-09-18 9:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-18 11:25 ` Thierry Reding
2012-09-18 20:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-19 6:55 ` Thierry Reding
2012-09-11 17:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-10 3:10 ` Greg Ungerer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504FE633.2090304@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mturquette@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox