From: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: vgoyal@redhat.com
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com,
ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com, martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Reset PCIe devices to address DMA problem on kdump with iommu
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:00:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50504F47.80909@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120911144323.GF12039@redhat.com>
(2012/09/11 23:43), Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:32:35PM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
>
> [..]
>> I'll post new patch which clears bus master bit and resets devices in
>> second kernel.
>>
>> As to the boot parameter to enable this function, you suggested using
>> reset_devices. I found that on a certain platform resetting devices
>> caused PCIe error due to a hardware bug. Therefore I think we need
>> new parameter apart from reset_devices to disable this function on
>> such a machine.
>
> Can you explain a bit more how the error happens. I still don't think
> that because of a bug in a platform somewhere we should be introducing
> a separate command line parameter and not reuse the exisiting one. Also
> you have not explained what's the bug and how a new parameter will
> avoid the bug.
The bug I mentioned is that ACS Violation occurs at PCIe switch when
reading PCI configuration after device reset. I got information that
this violation is caused by PCIe switch bug. The machine becomes fatal
status by this error.
The reason why I try to introduce new parameter is that I want to avoid
regression by this patch. Let's say this patch was included in kernel
and its reset function was enabled by reset_devices as you said. AFAIK
reset_devices is always needed for kdump, so it means that devices are
always reset at kdump boot time. It causes a regression that system
always becomes abnormal status when we run kdump on the machine which has
a bug I mentioned.
To avoid this regression, I want to separate reset_devices from this
reset function. Or how about this?
- if user specify reset_devices, devices are reset by this patch, as you
said.
- To avoid a regression I said, add new parameter like "pci=noreset".
If this parameter is specified, the reset function I add is disabled
and we can avoid regression.
Thanks,
Takao Indoh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-12 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-03 11:24 [RFC][PATCH] Reset PCIe devices to address DMA problem on kdump with iommu Takao Indoh
2012-08-03 11:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-08-06 4:30 ` Takao Indoh
2012-08-06 20:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-08-07 9:02 ` Takao Indoh
2012-09-05 11:09 ` Takao Indoh
2012-09-10 2:34 ` Kaneshige, Kenji
2012-09-10 6:35 ` Takao Indoh
2012-09-11 11:52 ` Kaneshige, Kenji
2012-09-10 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-09-11 10:32 ` Takao Indoh
2012-09-11 14:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-09-12 9:00 ` Takao Indoh [this message]
2012-09-14 15:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-09-24 11:22 ` Takao Indoh
2012-09-14 20:03 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-19 1:52 ` Takao Indoh
2012-09-21 17:57 ` Don Dutile
2012-09-24 11:12 ` Takao Indoh
2012-08-06 4:09 ` Don Dutile
2012-08-06 4:45 ` Takao Indoh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50504F47.80909@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox