From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753626Ab2ILUna (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:43:30 -0400 Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de ([134.100.9.70]:54705 "EHLO mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752268Ab2ILUn2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:43:28 -0400 Message-ID: <5050F3DB.1050202@metafoo.de> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:43:07 +0200 From: Lars-Peter Clausen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120724 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Ungerer CC: dedekind1@gmail.com, Russell King - ARM Linux , Mark Brown , Mike Turquette , Greg Ungerer , Julia Lawall , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available References: <1347202862-1617-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <20120909235059.GA2643@sirena.org.uk> <20120910001524.GL13739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120910002020.GB16249@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120910003913.GM13739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <504F4E36.20309@metafoo.de> <1347375033.27206.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <504FE633.2090304@snapgear.com> In-Reply-To: <504FE633.2090304@snapgear.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/12/2012 03:32 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 12/09/12 00:50, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 16:44 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >>> On 09/10/2012 02:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote: >>>>> [...] >>>>> OK, that's what I'd thought was going on - it was the fact that you'd >>>>> just acked the patch rather than asked for it to go to the patch >>>>> tracker >>>>> or something which made me wonder if things had changed. >>>> >>>> I kind'a forgot because it's been soo long since I took any of those >>>> patches... >>> >>> Ok, what's the plan? Should I add this patch to the patch tracker? >> >> I'd propose to send it to Linus for v3.6 even. > > If we do this can we make a decision quickly on it. > > I need to fix a regression on some ColdFire parts for 3.6. I either need > to use this clk patch, which fixes my problem, or a specific patch for the > ColdFire clk code http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134725225823437&w=2 > I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at least one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing devm_clk_get. Russell what's your plan for the patch? Maybe under the given circumstances it makes sense to let it go through the m68k tree. - Lars