Re: [PATCH] power: battery: Generic battery driver using IIO

anish singh
2012-09-14T05:21:16Z

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:46:32PM +0530, anish kumar wrote:
>> From: anish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
>>
>> In this version:
>> Addressed concerns raised by lars:
>> a. made the adc_bat per device.
>> b. get the IIO channel using hardcoded channel names.
>> c. Minor issues related to gpio_is_valid and some code
>> refactoring.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
>> ---
>
> Anish, much thanks for your work! This is much appreciated.
I can't thank you enough for your excellent review.I wonder how
you even spotted the indentation errors which even checkpatch
couldn't check.
>
> There are a few comments below, they don't require any design
> changes, just some technical issues, which wouldn't hard to fix,
> I guess.
>
> And again, thanks for your efforts!
>
>> drivers/power/generic-adc-battery.c | 460 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/power/generic-adc-battery.h | 33 ++
>> 2 files changed, 493 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/power/generic-adc-battery.c
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/power/generic-adc-battery.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/generic-adc-battery.c b/drivers/power/generic-adc-battery.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..003e0e1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/power/generic-adc-battery.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,460 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Generic battery driver code using IIO
>> + * Copyright (C) 2012, Anish Kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
>> + * based on jz4740-battery.c
>> + * based on s3c_adc_battery.c
>> + *
>> + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
>> + * License. See the file COPYING in the main directory of this archive for
>> + * more details.
>> + *
>
> No need for this empty comment line.
>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/timer.h>
>> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/types.h>
>> +
>
> No need for this empty line.
>
>> +#include <linux/power/generic-adc-battery.h>
>> +
>> +#define to_generic_bat(ptr) \
>> + container_of(ptr, struct generic_adc_bat, ptr)
>
> This will fit on one line.
>
> Plus, it look strange that you use 'struct generic_adc_bat' before
> actually declaring it. :-) Surely it works because it's a macro.
>
> Also, while this is a simple one-liner, I'd really suggest making
> it a function. That way you also won't have a risk to evaluate
> 'ptr' expression twice, plus the function is type-safe (unlike
> the macro).
>
>> +
>> +enum chan_type {
>> + VOLTAGE = 0,
>> + CURRENT,
>> + POWER,
>> + MAX_CHAN_TYPE
>
> The enum is in the global namespace. Please prefix items with
> GEN_ADC_BAT (or GENERIC_ADC_BAT, but that would be too long).
>
> Personally, I like making acronyms. I.e., while file name already
> makes it pretty clear that it is generic_adc_battery, in the file
> itself you can use short gab_ and GAB_ everywhere.
>
> Anyways, it's up to you. generic_adc_bat_ prefix is also fine. But
> be consistent.
>
> The same with chan_type, please prefix it with something.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define CHAN_MAX_NAME 30
>> +/*
>> + * channel_name suggests the standard channel names for commonly used
>> + * channel types.
>> + */
>> +char channel_name[][CHAN_MAX_NAME + 1] = {
>
> Ditto. gab_channel_name.
>
> Plus, you can make it char *gab_channel_name[] = {
> [VOLTAGE] = "voltage",
> [...] = ...,
> };
>
> Thus no need for MAX_NAME.
>
>> + [VOLTAGE] = "voltage",
>> + [CURRENT] = "current",
>> + [POWER] = "power",
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct generic_adc_bat {
>> + struct power_supply psy;
>> + struct iio_channel **channel;
>> + struct iio_battery_platform_data *pdata;
>> + struct delayed_work bat_work;
>> + int was_plugged;
>> + int volt_value;
>> + int cur_value;
>> + int level;
>> + int status;
>> + int cable_plugged:1;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void generic_adc_bat_ext_power_changed(struct power_supply *psy)
>> +{
>> + struct generic_adc_bat *adc_bat;
>> + adc_bat = to_generic_bat(psy);
>
> This would fit into one line.
>
>> +
>> + schedule_delayed_work(&adc_bat->bat_work,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(adc_bat->pdata->jitter_delay));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum power_supply_property bat_props[] = {
>
> While it's static, it still looks awkward that you don't prefix it.
>
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_EMPTY_DESIGN,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_NOW,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TECHNOLOGY,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MIN_DESIGN,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MAX_DESIGN,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_MODEL_NAME,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * This properties are set based on the received platform data and this
>> + * should correspond one-to-one with enum chan_type.
>> + */
>> +static enum power_supply_property dyn_props[] = {
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW,
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int charge_finished(struct generic_adc_bat *adc_bat)
>> +{
>> + return adc_bat->pdata->gpio_inverted ?
>> + !gpio_get_value(adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished) :
>> + gpio_get_value(adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished);
>
> That looks unreadable.
>
> How about:
>
> bool ret = gpio_get_value(adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished);
> bool inv = adc_bat->pdata->gpio_inverted;
>
> return ret ^ inv;
>
> (you can also make gpio_inverted bool, as well as return value of
> charge_finished function)
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +long read_scale_channel(struct generic_adc_bat *adc_bat,
>> + enum power_supply_property psp)
>
> static? prefix?
>
>> +{
>> + int scaleint, scalepart, iio_val, ret = 0;
>
> One variable declaration per line, please.
>
> int scaleint;
> int scalepart;
> etc.
>
>> + int result = 0;
>> +
>> + switch (psp) {
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW:
>> + ret = iio_read_channel_raw(adc_bat->channel[POWER],
>> + &iio_val);
>
> you don't use this return value, why assign?
>
> Also, this is very repeated.
>
> How about introducing a function
> int gab_read_chan(enum gab_chan, int *val, int *scaleint, int *scalepart)
> {
> int ret;
>
> ret = iio_read_channel_raw(chan, val);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> ret = iio_read_channel_scale(chan, scaleint, scalepart);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> Then you'll have
>
> switch (psp) {
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW:
> ret = gab_read_chan(adc_bat->channel[POWER],
> &iio_val, &scaleint, &scalepart);
> break;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW:
> ret = gab_read_chan(adc_bat->channel[VOLTAGE],
> &iio_val, &scaleint, &scalepart);
> break;
> ....
> }
>
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> It is easily noticed that this is quite repeating too.
>
> So we can do better, let's introduce property-to-channel function:
>
> enum gab_chan gab_prop_to_chan(enum power_supply_property psp)
> {
> switch (psp) {
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW:
> return GAB_POWER;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW:
> return GAB_VOLTAGE;
> ....
> }
> WARN_ON(1);
> return GAB_POWER;
> }
>
>
> And then we can just do this:
>
> enum gab_chan chan = gab_prop_to_chan(psp);
>
> ret = gab_read_chan(chan, &iio_val, &scaleint, &scalepart);
> if (ret < 0)
> return 0;
>
> Which is much nicer. :-)
>
>> + ret = iio_read_channel_scale(adc_bat->channel[POWER],
>> + &scaleint, &scalepart);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW:
>> + ret = iio_read_channel_raw(adc_bat->channel[VOLTAGE],
>> + &iio_val);
>> + ret = iio_read_channel_scale(adc_bat->channel[VOLTAGE],
>> + &scaleint, &scalepart);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW:
>> + ret = iio_read_channel_raw(adc_bat->channel[CURRENT],
>> + &iio_val);
>> + ret = iio_read_channel_scale(adc_bat->channel[CURRENT],
>> + &scaleint, &scalepart);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + switch (ret) {
>> + case IIO_VAL_INT:
>> + result = iio_val * scaleint;
>> + break;
>> + case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO:
>> + result = (s64)iio_val * (s64)scaleint +
>> + div_s64((s64)iio_val * (s64)scalepart, 1000000LL);
>> + break;
>> + case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO:
>> + result = (s64)iio_val * (s64)scaleint +
>> + div_s64((s64)iio_val * (s64)scalepart, 1000000000LL);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + return result;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int generic_adc_bat_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
>> + enum power_supply_property psp,
>> + union power_supply_propval *val)
>> +{
>> + struct generic_adc_bat *adc_bat;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + long result;
>> +
>> + adc_bat = to_generic_bat(psy);
>> + if (!adc_bat) {
>> + dev_err(psy->dev, "no battery infos ?!\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + result = read_scale_channel(adc_bat, psp);
>> + if (result < 0) {
>> + dev_err(psy->dev, "read channel error\n");
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + switch (psp) {
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS:
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished)) {
>> + if (adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished < 0)
>> + val->intval = adc_bat->level == 100000 ?
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_FULL :
>> + adc_bat->status;
>
> This is u?n(r)e:a<d?a->b=l&e. :-)
I didn't understand this but on a closer scrutiny, I got your point.
>
> Plus, I guess there's some logic error: you check gpio_charge_finished
> for gpio_is_valid, and then for it "< 0", which is always false. I
> think you don't need "< 0" check.
>
> How about a separate function for this?
>
> I.e.
>
> int gab_get_status(struct generic_adc_bat *gab)
> {
> struct gab_platform_data *pdata = gab->pdata;
> int chg_gpio = pdata->gpio_charge_finished
>
> if (!gpio_is_valid(chg_gpio) || adc_bat->level < 100000)
> return adc_bat->status;
>
> return POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_FULL;
> }
>
>> + else
>> + val->intval = adc_bat->status;
>> + }
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_EMPTY_DESIGN:
>> + val->intval = 0;
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_NOW:
>> + val->intval = adc_bat->pdata->cal_charge(result);
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW:
>> + val->intval = result;
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW:
>> + val->intval = result;
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW:
>> + val->intval = result;
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TECHNOLOGY:
>> + val->intval = adc_bat->pdata->battery_info.technology;
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MIN_DESIGN:
>> + val->intval = adc_bat->pdata->battery_info.voltage_min_design;
>
> You repeat 'adc_bat->pdata->battery_info' too much. Please introduce
> short a variable. I.e.
>
> struct power_supply_info *bi = &adc_bat->pdata->battery_info;
>
> Then you can type bi->voltage_min_design;
>
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MAX_DESIGN:
>> + val->intval = adc_bat->pdata->battery_info.voltage_max_design;
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN:
>> + val->intval = adc_bat->pdata->battery_info.charge_full_design;
>> + break;
>> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_MODEL_NAME:
>> + val->strval = adc_bat->pdata->battery_info.name;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +err:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void generic_adc_bat_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> + struct generic_adc_bat *adc_bat;
>> + struct delayed_work *delayed_work;
>> + int is_charged;
>> + int is_plugged;
>> +
>> + delayed_work = container_of(work,
>> + struct delayed_work, work);
> This fits into one line.
>
>> + adc_bat = container_of(delayed_work,
>> + struct generic_adc_bat, bat_work);
>
> Ditto.
>
>> + is_plugged = power_supply_am_i_supplied(&adc_bat->psy);
>> + adc_bat->cable_plugged = is_plugged;
>> + if (is_plugged != adc_bat->was_plugged) {
>> + adc_bat->was_plugged = is_plugged;
>> + if (is_plugged)
>> + adc_bat->status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING;
>> + else
>> + adc_bat->status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_DISCHARGING;
>> + } else {
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished)) {
>> + if ((adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished >= 0) &&
>
> If you use gpio_is_valid, you don't need another >= check.
>
>> + is_plugged) {
>> + is_charged = charge_finished(adc_bat);
>> + if (is_charged)
>> + adc_bat->status =
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_FULL;
>> + else
>> + adc_bat->status =
>> + POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + power_supply_changed(&adc_bat->psy);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t generic_adc_bat_charged(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct generic_adc_bat *adc_bat = dev_id;
>
> Need an empty line here.
>
>> + adc_bat = container_of(&adc_bat->bat_work,
>> + struct generic_adc_bat, bat_work);
>
> Something is seriously wrong here. You probably don't need container_of.
Right.I got used to using container_of so much that I didn't notice.
>
> Plus you pass pointer-to-pointer to request_irq()... I doubt it will
> work.
>
>> + schedule_delayed_work(&adc_bat->bat_work,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(adc_bat->pdata->jitter_delay));
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __devinit generic_adc_bat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct generic_adc_bat *adc_bat;
>> + struct iio_battery_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> + int ret, chan_index, fail = 0;
>
> One variable per line.
>
> int ret;
> int chan_index;
> ...
>
>> +
>> + adc_bat = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*adc_bat), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!adc_bat) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate memory\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* copying the battery name from platform data */
>> + adc_bat->psy.name = pdata->battery_name;
>> +
>> + /* bootup default values for the battery */
>> + adc_bat->volt_value = -1;
>> + adc_bat->cur_value = -1;
>> + adc_bat->cable_plugged = 0;
>> + adc_bat->status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_DISCHARGING;
>> + adc_bat->psy.type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_BATTERY;
>> + adc_bat->psy.get_property =
>> + generic_adc_bat_get_property;
>> + adc_bat->psy.external_power_changed =
>> + generic_adc_bat_ext_power_changed;
>
> These four lines will fit into two.
>
>> + adc_bat->pdata = pdata;
>> +
>> + /* calculate the total number of channels */
>> + for (chan_index = 0; channel_name[chan_index]; chan_index++)
>> + ;
>
> I think you can use ARRAY_SIZE(channel_name) macro from linux/kernel.h
> instead of the loop.
right.
>
> Plus, you should really name it num_chans.
>
>> +
>> + if (!chan_index) {
>> + pr_err("atleast provide one channel\n");
>
> The chan_index is calculated from the static array that never changes.
> I think you don't need this check.
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * copying the static properties and allocating extra memory for holding
>> + * the extra configurable properties received from platform data.
>> + */
>
> */ is wrongly indented.
>
>> + adc_bat->psy.properties = kzalloc(sizeof(bat_props)
>> + + sizeof(int)*chan_index, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Instead of sizeof(int), better sizeof(*adc_bat->psy.properties).
>
> Also, you need whitespaces around *.
>
> And I don't see where you're filling-in num_properties. How
> does it work without it?
It won't as I forgot to assign it.
>
>> + if (!adc_bat->psy.properties) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto first_mem_fail;
>> + }
>> + memcpy(adc_bat->psy.properties, bat_props, sizeof(bat_props));
>> +
>> + /* allocating memory for iio channels */
>> + adc_bat->channel = kzalloc(chan_index * sizeof(struct iio_channel),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> adc_bat->channels = kzalloc(num_chans * sizeof(*adc_bat->channels),
> GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Plus, I think you can use devm_kzalloc() here, and above.
>
>> + if (!adc_bat->channel) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto second_mem_fail;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * getting channel from iio and copying the battery properties
>> + * based on the channel supported by consumer device.
>> + */
>> + for (chan_index = 0; channel_name[chan_index]; chan_index++) {
>> + adc_bat->channel[chan_index] =
>> + iio_channel_get(dev_name(&pdev->dev),
>> + channel_name[chan_index]);
>> + /* we skip for channels which fail */
>> + if (IS_ERR(adc_bat->channel[chan_index]))
>> + fail++;
>> + else {
>
> Need {} braces for if statement too, so it'll have to be
> } else{, per coding style.
>
>> + static int index;
>
> empty line here please.
>
>> + memcpy(adc_bat->psy.properties +
>> + sizeof(bat_props) + sizeof(int)*index,
>> + &dyn_props[chan_index],
>> + sizeof(dyn_props[chan_index]));
>
> I'm too lazy to even think what it does... I hope it works. :-D
It is nothing but doing a selective memcpy based on the channels which
we found and incrementing the memory offset so as to copy the
next property.
>
>> + index++;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* none of the channels are supported so let's bail out */
>> + if (fail == chan_index) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(adc_bat->channel[chan_index]);
>> + goto second_mem_fail;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = power_supply_register(&pdev->dev, &adc_bat->psy);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_reg_fail;
>> +
>> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&adc_bat->bat_work, generic_adc_bat_work);
>> +
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->gpio_charge_finished)) {
>> + ret = gpio_request(pdata->gpio_charge_finished, "charged");
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_gpio;
>> +
>> + ret = request_any_context_irq(gpio_to_irq
>> + (pdata->gpio_charge_finished),
>
> Very unfortunate line break, at first I thought that you don't
> need parenthesis, but then I noticed that it's actually a function
> call. Heh. please introduce a local variable int irq; above (just
> after if (gpio_is_valid)...
>
> i.e.
>
> int irq = gpio_to_irq(pdata->gpio_charge_finished);
>
> ret = request_any_context_irq(irq, .....).
>
>> + generic_adc_bat_charged,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
>> + "battery charged", &adc_bat);
>
> Here, &adc_bat (pointer-to-pointer) looks very wrong. Why do you do
> this?
It is incorrect as you rightly pointed out.Initially(last to last
patch) adc_bat was
not a pointer. It was statically allocated but later I changed it to a
pointer(based
on lars comment) but forgot to change this.
Ideally this should have printed a warning but since the definition of
request_irq
is void* it didn't which is right conceptually.
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_gpio;
>> + } else
>> + goto err_gpio; /* let's bail out */
>
> } else {
> ...
> }
>
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, &adc_bat);
>> +
>> + /* Schedule timer to check current status */
>> + schedule_delayed_work(&adc_bat->bat_work,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(0));
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_gpio:
>> + power_supply_unregister(&adc_bat->psy);
>> +err_reg_fail:
>> + for (chan_index = 0; channel_name[chan_index]; chan_index++)
>> + iio_channel_release(adc_bat->channel[chan_index]);
>> + kfree(adc_bat->channel);
>> +second_mem_fail:
>> + kfree(adc_bat->psy.properties);
>> +first_mem_fail:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int generic_adc_bat_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + int chan_index;
>> + struct generic_adc_bat *adc_bat = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> + power_supply_unregister(&adc_bat->psy);
>> +
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished)) {
>> + if (adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished >= 0) {
>
> You don't need >= check. gpio_is_valid is used for this.
>
>> + free_irq(gpio_to_irq(
>> + adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished),
>> + NULL);
>
> Please don't be scared to introduce temporary variables if they make
> code more readable. Here, introduce 'int irq = gpio_to_irq(...)';
>
>> + gpio_free(adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (chan_index = 0; channel_name[chan_index]; chan_index++)
>> + iio_channel_release(adc_bat->channel[chan_index]);
>> + cancel_delayed_work(&adc_bat->bat_work);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +static int generic_adc_bat_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct generic_adc_bat *adc_bat = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&adc_bat->bat_work);
>> + adc_bat->status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_UNKNOWN;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int generic_adc_bat_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct generic_adc_bat *adc_bat = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + /* Schedule timer to check current status */
>> + schedule_delayed_work(&adc_bat->bat_work,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(adc_bat->pdata->jitter_delay));
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops generic_adc_battery_pm_ops = {
>> + .suspend = generic_adc_bat_suspend,
>> + .resume = generic_adc_bat_resume,
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define GENERIC_ADC_BATTERY_PM_OPS (&generic_adc_battery_pm_ops)
>> +#else
>> +#define GENERIC_ADC_BATTERY_PM_OPS (NULL)
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver generic_adc_bat_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "generic-adc-battery",
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .pm = GENERIC_ADC_BATTERY_PM_OPS
>> + },
>> + .probe = generic_adc_bat_probe,
>> + .remove = generic_adc_bat_remove,
>> +};
>> +
>
> No need for this empty line.
>
>> +module_platform_driver(generic_adc_bat_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("anish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("generic battery driver using IIO");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> diff --git a/include/linux/power/generic-adc-battery.h b/include/linux/power/generic-adc-battery.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..d7c6d20
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/power/generic-adc-battery.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
>> +/*
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef GENERIC_ADC_BATTERY_H
>> +#define GENERIC_ADC_BATTERY_H
>> +
>> +/* should be enough for the channel names */
>> +#define BAT_MAX_NAME 30
>> +
>> +enum chan_type {
>> + VOLTAGE = 0,
>> + CURRENT,
>> + POWER,
>> + MAX_CHAN_TYPE
>> +};
>
> You define chan_type twice. Keep only one declaration, this one,
> in the header file.
>
>> +
>> +extern char channel_name[][BAT_MAX_NAME + 1];
>
> Uhm. Making it extern means that you're no longer able to use
> this driver as a module. And the module isn't a problem per se,
> it just a sign of some bigger problem... Maybe you should rethink
> how you pass channel name, dunno.
this is my mistake.I forgot to remove this and above enum type
from *.h file.
>
>> +struct iio_battery_platform_data {
>
> Inconsistent. Either use generic_adc_battery_ prefix, or
> iio_battery_, or anything you like, but please be consistent across
> all the driver and files.
>
>> + struct power_supply_info battery_info;
>> + char **channel_name;
>> + char *battery_name;
>> + int (*cal_charge)(long);
>
> Long what? :-) Please specify a variable name.
>
>> + int gpio_charge_finished;
>> + int gpio_inverted;
>> + int bat_poll_interval;
>> + int jitter_delay;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#endif /* GENERIC_ADC_BATTERY_H */
>
> Cheers,
> Anton.