public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@mimc.co.uk>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Advice on mmap() "feature"
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 20:21:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <505626A8.8040806@mimc.co.uk> (raw)

Apologies if this is the wrong place to post this query.  Please feel 
free to redirect me to the correct place.

I have come across a weird (but documented [1]) "feature" of mmap(), 
which is:-

"The mmap()function adds an extra reference to the file associated with 
the file descriptor fildeswhich is not removed by a subsequent close() 
on that file descriptor. This reference is removed when there are no 
more mappings to the file."

In my embedded application, this is resulting in the consumption of 
available file descriptors.

As an example I wrote the following test running on Ubuntu 11.04 64bit.

#include <fcntl.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>

#define FRAM_SIZE            (64 * 1024)
#define FRAM_BASE_ADDRESS    0x00000000

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
     int i;
     for (i = 0; i < 5000; i++)
     {
         // open the fram device
         int m_fdFram = open("/dev/mem", O_RDWR | O_SYNC);
         if (m_fdFram < 0)
         {
             printf("could not open /dev/mem, exiting with errno %d\n", 
errno);
             return 0;
         }

         // map the device to memory
         char *m_pFram = (char *)mmap(    0,
                                         FRAM_SIZE * sizeof(unsigned short),
                                         PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
                                         MAP_SHARED,
                                         m_fdFram,
                                         FRAM_BASE_ADDRESS);
         if ((int)m_pFram == -1)
         {
             close(m_fdFram);
             m_fdFram = -1;
             printf("could not mmap, exiting with errno %d\n", errno);
             return 0;
         }

         // now remove the mapping
         if (m_pFram)
         munmap(m_pFram, FRAM_SIZE);

         if (m_fdFram != -1)
             close(m_fdFram);
     }

     puts("sleeping");
     sleep(50);

     return 0;
}

$ gcc test.c -o test
$ cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
10016    0    387704
$ ./test &
sleeping
$ cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
15008    0    387704

As can be seen, when I run the test, it consumes 5000 fd's, but only 
releases them when the application closes, 50 seconds later.

My application is designed to run for many years without a restart, 
spawning other tasks to do various system jobs, these fd's never seem to 
get released, and eventually the system runs out of available fd's.

So my questions are:-

(a) Since all the mappings have been removed, so why don't the fd's get 
released ?

(b) Can I somehow force some form of garbage collection to allow the 
fd's to be freed up ?

Again, apologies if this is the wrong place to ask, but I'm out of ideas.

Thanks in advance
Mark JACKSON

[1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908775/xsh/mmap.html

             reply	other threads:[~2012-09-16 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-16 19:21 Mark Jackson [this message]
2012-09-16 20:52 ` Advice on mmap() "feature" richard -rw- weinberger
2012-09-17  7:54   ` Mark Jackson
2012-09-17 11:17 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=505626A8.8040806@mimc.co.uk \
    --to=mpfj-list@mimc.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox