public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] pda_power: remove ac_draw_failed goto and label
@ 2012-09-21  0:56 Paul Parsons
  2012-09-21 23:51 ` Anton Vorontsov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Parsons @ 2012-09-21  0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cbou, dwmw2; +Cc: philipp.zabel, linux-kernel

A previous patch added the ac_draw_failed goto and label to
pda_power_probe(). The goto would be invoked after a failed call to
regulator_get().

However the way ac_draw is used - always after a check for NULL -
suggests that a failed call to regulator_get() was not fatal.

This patch removes the ac_draw_failed goto and label, partly reverting
the previous patch.

This patch also removes the assignment of an error code to ret after a
failed call to regulator_get(), since the error code is now never used.

Signed-off-by: Paul Parsons <lost.distance@yahoo.com>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
---
  drivers/power/pda_power.c |    3 ---
  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/power/pda_power.c b/drivers/power/pda_power.c
index d3be834d..7df7c5f 100644
--- a/drivers/power/pda_power.c
+++ b/drivers/power/pda_power.c
@@ -284,9 +284,7 @@ static int pda_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	ac_draw = regulator_get(dev, "ac_draw");
  	if (IS_ERR(ac_draw)) {
  		dev_dbg(dev, "couldn't get ac_draw regulator\n");
-		ret = PTR_ERR(ac_draw);
  		ac_draw = NULL;
-		goto ac_draw_failed;
  	}

  	update_status();
@@ -416,7 +414,6 @@ ac_supply_failed:
  		regulator_put(ac_draw);
  		ac_draw = NULL;
  	}
-ac_draw_failed:
  	if (pdata->exit)
  		pdata->exit(dev);
  init_failed:
-- 
1.7.8.6


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pda_power: remove ac_draw_failed goto and label
  2012-09-21  0:56 [PATCH] pda_power: remove ac_draw_failed goto and label Paul Parsons
@ 2012-09-21 23:51 ` Anton Vorontsov
  2012-09-22  0:59   ` Paul Parsons
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anton Vorontsov @ 2012-09-21 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Parsons; +Cc: dwmw2, philipp.zabel, linux-kernel

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:56:43AM +0100, Paul Parsons wrote:
> A previous patch added the ac_draw_failed goto and label to
> pda_power_probe(). The goto would be invoked after a failed call to
> regulator_get().
> 
> However the way ac_draw is used - always after a check for NULL -
> suggests that a failed call to regulator_get() was not fatal.
> 
> This patch removes the ac_draw_failed goto and label, partly reverting
> the previous patch.
> 
> This patch also removes the assignment of an error code to ret after a
> failed call to regulator_get(), since the error code is now never used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Parsons <lost.distance@yahoo.com>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/power/pda_power.c |    3 ---
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/power/pda_power.c b/drivers/power/pda_power.c
> index d3be834d..7df7c5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/pda_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/pda_power.c
> @@ -284,9 +284,7 @@ static int pda_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	ac_draw = regulator_get(dev, "ac_draw");
>  	if (IS_ERR(ac_draw)) {
>  		dev_dbg(dev, "couldn't get ac_draw regulator\n");
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(ac_draw);
>  		ac_draw = NULL;
> -		goto ac_draw_failed;

For some reason you have a bit different code, so your patch is not based
on the battery tree. (In my tree ret and ac_draw assignments are swapped.)
Maybe that's because I had to manually redo your first patch...

Anyway, I repeated your patch by hand again and thus applied it.

Thank you!

>  	}
> 
>  	update_status();
> @@ -416,7 +414,6 @@ ac_supply_failed:
>  		regulator_put(ac_draw);
>  		ac_draw = NULL;
>  	}
> -ac_draw_failed:
>  	if (pdata->exit)
>  		pdata->exit(dev);
>  init_failed:
> -- 
> 1.7.8.6

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pda_power: remove ac_draw_failed goto and label
  2012-09-21 23:51 ` Anton Vorontsov
@ 2012-09-22  0:59   ` Paul Parsons
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Parsons @ 2012-09-22  0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anton Vorontsov; +Cc: dwmw2, philipp.zabel, linux-kernel

Hello Anton,

On 22/09/12 00:51, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:56:43AM +0100, Paul Parsons wrote:
>> A previous patch added the ac_draw_failed goto and label to
>> pda_power_probe(). The goto would be invoked after a failed call to
>> regulator_get().
>>
>> However the way ac_draw is used - always after a check for NULL -
>> suggests that a failed call to regulator_get() was not fatal.
>>
>> This patch removes the ac_draw_failed goto and label, partly reverting
>> the previous patch.
>>
>> This patch also removes the assignment of an error code to ret after a
>> failed call to regulator_get(), since the error code is now never used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Parsons <lost.distance@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/power/pda_power.c |    3 ---
>>   1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/pda_power.c b/drivers/power/pda_power.c
>> index d3be834d..7df7c5f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/pda_power.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/pda_power.c
>> @@ -284,9 +284,7 @@ static int pda_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	ac_draw = regulator_get(dev, "ac_draw");
>>   	if (IS_ERR(ac_draw)) {
>>   		dev_dbg(dev, "couldn't get ac_draw regulator\n");
>> -		ret = PTR_ERR(ac_draw);
>>   		ac_draw = NULL;
>> -		goto ac_draw_failed;
>
> For some reason you have a bit different code, so your patch is not based
> on the battery tree. (In my tree ret and ac_draw assignments are swapped.)
> Maybe that's because I had to manually redo your first patch...
>
> Anyway, I repeated your patch by hand again and thus applied it.

Yes, in my first patch I had swapped the ret and ac_draw assignments
when I moved the regulator_get() call to before the update_charger()
call. This was because the original order of the assignments:

ac_draw = NULL;
ret = PTR_ERR(ac_draw);

is obviously incorrect; the ac_draw assignment overwrites the error
code that should be returned by PTR_ERR().

Anyway, thank you for sorting this out!

Regards,
Paul

> Thank you!
>
>>   	}
>>
>>   	update_status();
>> @@ -416,7 +414,6 @@ ac_supply_failed:
>>   		regulator_put(ac_draw);
>>   		ac_draw = NULL;
>>   	}
>> -ac_draw_failed:
>>   	if (pdata->exit)
>>   		pdata->exit(dev);
>>   init_failed:
>> --
>> 1.7.8.6


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-22  0:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-21  0:56 [PATCH] pda_power: remove ac_draw_failed goto and label Paul Parsons
2012-09-21 23:51 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-09-22  0:59   ` Paul Parsons

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox