linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RCU idle CPU detection is broken in linux-next
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:26:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <505C6B03.7020305@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120921121346.GD2458@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 09/21/2012 02:13 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> This might be unrelated, but I got the following dump as well when trinity
>> > decided it's time to reboot my guest:
> OK, sounds like we should hold off until you reproduce, then.

I'm not sure what you mean.

There are basically two issues I'm seeing now, which reproduce pretty much every
time:

 1. The "using when idle" warning.
 2. The rcu related hangs during shutdown.

The first one appears early on when I start fuzzing, the other one happens when
shutting down - so both of them are reproducible in the same session.


Thanks,
Sasha

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-21 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-12 17:56 RCU idle CPU detection is broken in linux-next Sasha Levin
2012-09-19 15:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-19 16:35   ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-19 17:06     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-19 22:27       ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-20  7:33       ` Michael Wang
2012-09-20  7:44         ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-20  8:14           ` Michael Wang
2012-09-20 15:23           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-21  9:30             ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-21 12:13               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-21 13:26                 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2012-09-21 15:12                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-21 15:18                     ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-22  8:26                       ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-22 15:09                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-22 15:20                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-22 15:40                           ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-22 15:56                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-22 17:50                               ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-22 21:27                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-23  0:21                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-23  5:39                                     ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-24 21:29                                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-24 22:47                                         ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-24 22:54                                           ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-24 23:06                                             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-24 23:10                                               ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-24 23:35                                                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-24 23:41                                                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-25  4:04                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-25 11:59                                                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-25 13:04                                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-26 14:56                                                           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-26 16:26                                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-25 12:06                                                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-25 18:28                                                   ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-25 18:36                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-26 15:46                                                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-26 16:59                                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-26 14:58                                                     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=505C6B03.7020305@gmail.com \
    --to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).