From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754206Ab2IVLQS (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2012 07:16:18 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail02.westnet.com.au ([203.10.1.243]:27981 "EHLO outbound-mail02.westnet.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752947Ab2IVLQQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2012 07:16:16 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvgCACGdXVB787/Z/2dsb2JhbAANOL0eBASELAEBAQQ4QAEQCxIGCRYPCQMCAQIBNw4GDQEHAQGHbgEdpRSTWYschioDlnqSBg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,467,1344182400"; d="scan'208";a="268336530" Message-ID: <505D9DFB.8080002@westnet.com.au> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:16:11 +1000 From: Greg Ungerer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Al Viro CC: Mark Salter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited References: <20120917032651.GU13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1348244799-16013-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <20120921183934.GK13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120921183934.GK13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/22/2012 04:39 AM, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:26:36PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: >> Here are a set of c6x patches to work with your experimental-kernel_thread >> branch. >> >> Mark Salter (3): >> c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread() >> c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve >> c6x: switch to generic sys_execve > > Applied and pushed... > > FWIW, the current status: > > alpha - done, tested on hardware > arm - done, tested on qemu > c6x - done by maintainer > frv - done, untested > m68k - done, tested on aranym; there's a known issue in copy_thread() in > case of coldfire-MMU, presumably to be handled in m68k tree (I can do it > in this one instead, if m68k folks would prefer it that way) I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert. http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2 I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind if you would rather take it with your changes. Regards Greg