public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] dm-integrity: integrity protection device-mapper target
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:47:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50606456.7020607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1348480396.git.dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>

On 09/24/2012 11:55 AM, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> Both dm-verity and dm-crypt provide block level integrity protection.

This is not correct. dm-crypt is transparent block encryption target,
where always size of plaintext == size of ciphertext.

So it can provide confidentiality but it CANNOT provide integrity protection.

We need extra space to store auth tag which dmcrypt cannot provide currently.

> dm-integrity provides a lighter weight read-write block level integrity
> protection for file systems not requiring full disk encryption, but
> which do require writability.

Obvious question: can be dm-verity extended to provide read-write integrity?

I would prefer to use standard mode like GCM to provide both encryption and
integrity protection than inventing something new.

Milan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-24 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-24  9:55 [PATCH 0/1] dm-integrity: integrity protection device-mapper target Dmitry Kasatkin
2012-09-24  9:55 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Dmitry Kasatkin
2012-09-24 13:47 ` Milan Broz [this message]
2012-09-24 16:20   ` [PATCH 0/1] " Kasatkin, Dmitry
2012-09-25 12:15     ` Milan Broz
2012-09-25 15:42       ` Kasatkin, Dmitry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50606456.7020607@redhat.com \
    --to=mbroz@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox