Re: [PATCH] x86: remove the useless branch in c_start()

Michael Wang
2012-09-27T02:29:43Z

On 09/26/2012 09:02 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:43:52AM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> On 09/19/2012 01:42 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>>> Since 'cpu == -1' in cpumask_next() is legal, no need to handle '*pos == 0'
>>> specially.
>>>
>>> About the comments:
>>> /* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */
>>> A test with a cpumask in which cpu 0 is not the first has been done, and it
>>> works well.
>>
>> Could I get some comments on this patch?
>
> Looks ok to me:
>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
>
> Thanks.

Thanks for your review.

Regards,
Michael Wang
>