The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jérôme Pouiller" <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
To: greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, "Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Elder" <elder@kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Damien Riégel" <damien.riegel@silabs.com>
Cc: "Silicon Labs Kernel Team" <linux-devel@silabs.com>,
	"Damien Riégel" <damien.riegel@silabs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] greybus: cpc: introduce CPC header structure
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:46:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50633527.fMDQidcC6G@nb0018864> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260115155808.36102-7-damien.riegel@silabs.com>

On Thursday 15 January 2026 16:57:59 Central European Standard Time Damien Riégel wrote:
> CPC main features are reliable transmission and remote's receive window
> management. To implement these features, an additional header is needed.
> This header is prepended to all Greybus messages.
> 
> Reliable transmission: to make transmission reliable, messages are
> sequenced and acknowledged. That constitutes two bytes of the header,
> one for the sequence number, one for the acknowledgment number. If a
> message is not acked in a timely manner, a retransmission mechanism will
> attempt another transmission. That mechanism will be implemented in a
> future patch set.
> 
> Remote's receive window: the remote advertises the number of reception
> buffers that are available on this cport. The other peer must take care
> of not sending more messages than advertised by the remote. This is a
> sort of flow control. That accounts for one byte in the header.
> 
> The remaining byte carries some flags. For instance, there is a flag to
> indicate if it's a CPC message or a Greybus message.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Riégel <damien.riegel@silabs.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   - Minor tweaks to structure documentation
> 
>  drivers/greybus/cpc/header.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/greybus/cpc/header.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/greybus/cpc/header.h b/drivers/greybus/cpc/header.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..af283fec492
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/greybus/cpc/header.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2025, Silicon Laboratories, Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __CPC_HEADER_H
> +#define __CPC_HEADER_H
> +
> +#include <linux/greybus.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#define CPC_HEADER_MAX_RX_WINDOW U8_MAX
> +
> +/**
> + * struct cpc header - Representation of CPC header.
> + * @ctrl_flags: contains the type of frame and other control flags.
> + * @recv_wnd: number of buffers that the cport can receive without blocking.
> + * @seq: sequence number.
> + * @ack: acknowledge number, indicate to the remote the next sequence number
> + *	 this peer expects to see.
> + *
> + * Each peer can confirm reception of frames by setting the acknowledgment number to the next frame
> + * it expects to see, i.e. setting the ack number to X effectively acknowledges frames with sequence
> + * number up to X-1.
> + *
> + * CPC is designed around the concept that each cport has its pool of reception buffers. The number
> + * of buffers in a pool is advertised to the remote via the @recv_wnd attribute. This acts as
> + * software flow-control, and a peer shall not send frames to a remote if the @recv_wnd is zero.
> + *
> + * The eighth-bit (0x80) of the control byte indicates if the frame targets CPC or Greybus. If the
> + * bit is set, the frame should be interpreted as a CPC control frame. For simplicity, control
> + * frames have the same encoding as Greybus frames.
> + */
> +struct cpc_header {
> +	__u8 ctrl_flags;
> +	__u8 recv_wnd;
> +	__u8 seq;
> +	__u8 ack;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +#define CPC_HEADER_SIZE (sizeof(struct cpc_header))
> +#define GREYBUS_HEADER_SIZE (sizeof(struct gb_operation_msg_hdr))

Generally, when I see such macros in the code, I suspect some black
magic behind. So, I have to check the definitions.

I suggest to not introduce these trivial symbols and just use
"sizeof(struct ...)" inline in the code.



-- 
Jérôme Pouiller



  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-15 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-15 15:57 [PATCH v2 00/14] greybus: introduce CPC as transport layer Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] greybus: cpc: add minimal CPC Host Device infrastructure Damien Riégel
2026-01-16 15:11   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-01-27 21:11     ` Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] greybus: cpc: introduce CPC cport structure Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] greybus: cpc: use socket buffers instead of gb_message in TX path Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] greybus: cpc: pack cport ID in Greybus header Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] greybus: cpc: switch RX path to socket buffers Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] greybus: cpc: introduce CPC header structure Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 21:46   ` Jérôme Pouiller [this message]
2026-01-15 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] greybus: cpc: account for CPC header size in RX and TX path Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] greybus: cpc: add and validate sequence numbers Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 21:46   ` Jérôme Pouiller
2026-01-15 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] greybus: cpc: acknowledge all incoming messages Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] greybus: cpc: use holding queue instead of sending out immediately Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] greybus: cpc: honour remote's RX window Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] greybus: cpc: let host device drivers dequeue TX frames Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] greybus: cpc: add private data pointer in CPC Host Device Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] greybus: cpc: add CPC SDIO host driver Damien Riégel
2026-01-15 21:46   ` Jérôme Pouiller
2026-01-15 22:34   ` Jérôme Pouiller
2026-01-15 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] greybus: introduce CPC as transport layer Jérôme Pouiller
2026-01-15 22:48   ` Jérôme Pouiller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50633527.fMDQidcC6G@nb0018864 \
    --to=jerome.pouiller@silabs.com \
    --cc=damien.riegel@silabs.com \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-devel@silabs.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox