From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Distinguish TLB shootdown interrupts from other functions call interrupts
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:02:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5063F9FD.8050002@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120926021128.22212.20440.stgit@hpxw>
>>
>> the 3.6 kernel will closed soon. it will be great to has this patch in.
>> So, could you like to refresh your patch with popular comments format? :)
>
> Fixed patch is below.
> Thank you for the review again.
>
Peter:
Maybe the patch doesn't looks perfect for this issue.
So I am wondering if the following patch is better, if we don't care the irq_tlb
was counted again in irq_call?
===
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 613cd83..2d6d8ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static void flush_tlb_func(void *info)
{
struct flush_tlb_info *f = info;
+ inc_irq_stat(irq_tlb_count);
+
if (f->flush_mm != this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm))
return;
===
Or another solution is also reducing double counted irq_tlb_count from irq_call_count
What's your comments of this?
===
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
index d3895db..aac7886 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(irq_cpustat_t, irq_stat);
#define __ARCH_IRQ_STAT
#define inc_irq_stat(member) this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.member)
+#define dec_irq_stat(member) this_cpu_dec(irq_stat.member)
#define local_softirq_pending() this_cpu_read(irq_stat.__softirq_pending)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 613cd83..b82bd9f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ static void flush_tlb_func(void *info)
{
struct flush_tlb_info *f = info;
+ /* remove double counted irq_tlb_count from irq_call_count */
+ dec_irq_stat(irq_call_count);
+ inc_irq_stat(irq_tlb_count);
+
if (f->flush_mm != this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm))
return;
===
Thanks
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-27 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <50611D82.4010702@intel.com>
2012-09-26 2:11 ` [PATCH] x86: Distinguish TLB shootdown interrupts from other functions call interrupts Tomoki Sekiyama
2012-09-26 2:17 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-27 7:02 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2012-09-28 5:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-09-28 6:08 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-28 6:13 ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Tomoki Sekiyama
2012-09-19 9:04 [PATCH] " Tomoki Sekiyama
2012-09-20 1:18 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-20 8:50 ` Tomoki Sekiyama
2012-09-21 8:08 ` Alex Shi
2012-09-24 1:37 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5063F9FD.8050002@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).