public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] workqueue: add WORKER_RESCUER
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:11:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <506577CB.1050401@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120926180711.GB12544@google.com>

On 09/27/2012 02:07 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:20:32AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> rescuer thread must be a worker which is WORKER_NOT_RUNNING:
>> 	If it is *not* WORKER_NOT_RUNNING, it will increase the nr_running
>> 	and it disables the normal workers wrongly.
>>
>> So rescuer thread must be WORKER_NOT_RUNNING.
>>
>> Currently code implement it by always setting WORKER_PREP on rescuer thread,
>> but this kind of implement is ugly:
>> A)	It reuses WORKER_PREP which is used for a different meaning.
>> B)	It does not told us rescuer thread is WORKER_NOT_RUNNING.
>>
>> So we add WORKER_RESCUER to fix these two sematic.
> 
> Ah, right, we always have WORKER_PREP set for rescuers.  So, this
> doesn't actually change the behavior at all?  

No, this doesn't change the behavior at all.

> I'm not necessarily
> against it but the commit message seems a bit misleading.
> 

I just try my best to say" we need to add WORKER_RESCUER to told us
rescuer is WORKER_NOT_RUNNING explicity, using WORKER_PREP only will
hide this info"

Thanks,
Lai


  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-28 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-26 17:20 [PATCH 00/12] workqueue: simple cleanups Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 01/12] workqueue: add WORKER_RESCUER Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:07   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 10:11     ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] workqueue: disallow set_cpus_allowed_ptr() from work item Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:12   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] workqueue: remove WORKER_PREP from rescuer Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:24   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 10:04     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-30  7:39       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] workqueue: simplify is_chained_work() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:28   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28  9:52     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-30  7:32       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] workqueue: don't wake up other workers in rescuer Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:34   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28 10:18     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 06/12] workqueue: destroy_worker() can only destory idle worker not just created worker Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:35   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] workqueue: remove WORKER_STARTED Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:36   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28  9:52     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] workqueue: fix comments of insert_work() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] workqueue: declare system_highpri_wq Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpu-hotplug.txt: fix comments of work_on_cpu() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] workqueue: add WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE to system_long_wq Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-26 18:38   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-28  8:06     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-30  7:22       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:20 ` [PATCH 12/12] workqueue: avoid work_on_cpu() to interfere system_wq Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=506577CB.1050401@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox