From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756752Ab2I2Qtj (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:49:39 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:42277 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756172Ab2I2Qth (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:49:37 -0400 Message-ID: <506726AF.8040307@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:49:51 +0200 From: Sasha Levin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120913 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: Frederic Weisbecker , Dave Jones , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: rcu: eqs related warnings in linux-next References: <50659D37.2020206@gmail.com> <20120928133633.GC12843@somewhere.redhat.com> <20120928173133.GB2498@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <50669952.1000805@gmail.com> <20120929133737.GB2551@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20120929133737.GB2551@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/29/2012 03:37 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Sasha, is the easily reproducible? If so, could you please try the > previous patch? It will likely give us more information on where > this bug really lives. (Yes, it might totally obscure the bug, but > in that case we will just need to try some other perturbation.) Unlike the last issue, this one is *very* non-reproducible. In fact, I've only hit it once so far. Thanks, Sasha