From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752333Ab2JBJMf (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 05:12:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61635 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751461Ab2JBJMc (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 05:12:32 -0400 Message-ID: <506AAFED.2050600@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 11:12:13 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Bottomley CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi fixes for 3.6 References: <1343309288-32615-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <50699682.9020804@redhat.com> <1349165906.2406.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> In-Reply-To: <1349165906.2406.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 02/10/2012 10:18, James Bottomley ha scritto: > On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:11 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 26/07/2012 15:28, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: >>> James, >>> >>> patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU >>> passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux >>> it must become 32768 (because LUNs above 255 are "relocated" to 16640). >>> Patch 2 is a resubmission of the patch for online resizing of virtio-scsi >>> LUNs, which needs to be rebased. >>> >>> LUNs above 255 now work for all of scanning, hotplug, hotunplug and >>> resize. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Paolo >>> >>> Paolo Bonzini (2): >>> virtio-scsi: fix LUNs greater than 255 >>> virtio-scsi: support online resizing of disks >>> >>> drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>> include/linux/virtio_scsi.h | 2 ++ >>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Ping, are these patches going into 3.7? > > They're 3.7 candidates yes (enhancements certainly aren't 3.6). > I seem to have become lost with the virtio-scsi updates since what I have > marked for inclusion is a patch series that's a partial intersection > with this. I'll flush my queue for virto-scsi, please resend all the > missing patches you want in 3.7. Ok, will do so soon and tag the appropriate ones for stable. Paolo