linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: add queue-private command filter, editable via sysfs
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:12:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <506D60FC.7090801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348587009-22400-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Il 25/09/2012 17:30, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> The set of use cases for SG_IO is quite variable that no single filter can
> accomodate all of them.  The current filter is tailored very much to
> CD burning, and includes many MMC-specific commands that may have
> other meanings in different standards.  Someone may want to remove
> those commands; at the same time, people that trust their users may
> want to add persistent reservations, trim/discard, or even access to
> vendor-specific commands.
> 
> Filters used to be mutable via sysfs, but the implementation was
> never enabled.  Add it back, and let the admin set this up per device.
> 
> A simple bitmap does not let you do things like enabling command A with
> option B on a specific device for a certain block range.  However, the
> question is really whether this is needed---in fact, neither of the known
> uses for the filtering need it.
> 
> In one use case, the administrator then needs the ability to configure
> devices easily, for example to be much more restrictive on non-MMC
> devices.  It must be done with the same tools it uses for other aspects
> of the policy---which will be a combination of DAC (Unix permissions and
> ACLs) and sysfs.  Different SCSI standards may give different meanings
> for the same byte value, but a simple bitmap is enough for this.
> 
> In the virtualization case, the problem is really that you want to
> pass through everything or almost everything, while still running as
> confined as possible (i.e. CAP_SYS_RAWIO is not a choice).  But in this
> case a more complex filtering can be done just as easily in userspace,
> in the virtual machine monitor.  While the userspace filter can be
> subverted if the guest can escape the QEMU jail, the bitmap still lets
> you block some commands at the kernel level if really necessary.
> 
> One alternative is a ioctl to disable the filter altogether, to be
> used together with SCM_RIGHTS file descriptor passing.  This works in
> the virtualization case but not for policy decisions.  So this patch
> series provides the sysfs knob.  It is a tweaked revert of commit 018e044
> (block: get rid of queue-private command filter, 2009-06-26).
> 
> Please review!
> 
> Paolo
> 
> v1->v2: add OOM and capability checks
> 
> Paolo Bonzini (3):
>   block: add back queue-private command filter
>   scsi: create an all-zero filter for scanners
>   block: add back command filter modification via sysfs
> 
>  Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt |   16 +++++
>  block/Kconfig                       |   10 +++
>  block/blk-sysfs.c                   |   43 +++++++++++++
>  block/bsg.c                         |    2 +-
>  block/scsi_ioctl.c                  |  117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c            |    6 ++-
>  drivers/scsi/sg.c                   |    7 +-
>  include/linux/blkdev.h              |   31 +++++++++-
>  8 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Ping?

Tejun, Jens, anyone else, any hope that this gets in 3.7?

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-04 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-25 15:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] block: add queue-private command filter, editable via sysfs Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-25 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add back queue-private command filter Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-25 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: create an all-zero filter for scanners Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-25 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] block: add back command filter modification via sysfs Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-04 10:12 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-10-19  0:22   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] block: add queue-private command filter, editable " Tejun Heo
2012-10-19  9:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
     [not found]       ` <2007908429.13363375.1350637872646.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
     [not found]         ` <20121019201058.GP13370@google.com>
     [not found]           ` <5087E093.50700@redhat.com>
     [not found]             ` <CAOS58YM5ZO9h0XUCNxV+6U3UzpeUen5ZuyqsNEUaJ81ux=QKvw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]               ` <5088EC43.2010600@redhat.com>
2012-10-25 18:00                 ` setting up CDB filters in udev (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block: add queue-private command filter, editable via sysfs) Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 18:35                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-31 12:52                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-31 21:22                     ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 14:49                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-02 15:35                         ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 16:48                           ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 17:21                             ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 17:30                               ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 20:18                                 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 20:21                                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 20:48                                     ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 22:59                                       ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 23:52                                         ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 23:58                                           ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-03  0:19                                             ` Alan Cox
2012-11-03  0:23                                               ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-03  0:52                                                 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-02 16:51                         ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 17:49                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-02 17:53                             ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-03 13:20                               ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-03 14:50                                 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-05 11:08                                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-05 18:18                                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-05 20:12                                     ` Alan Cox
2012-11-05 20:09                                       ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-05 20:17                                         ` Alan Cox
2012-11-05 20:15                                           ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-05 18:26                                 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=506D60FC.7090801@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).