linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, rob@landley.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	joerg.roedel@amd.com, bhelgaas@google.com, shuahkhan@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] swiotlb: Instead of tracking the end of the swiotlb region just calculate it
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:54:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <506DB121.3020700@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121004130107.GB9158@phenom.dumpdata.com>

On 10/04/2012 06:01 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 05:38:47PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> In the case of swiotlb we already have the start of the region and the number
>> of slabs that give us the region size.  Instead of having to call
>> virt_to_phys on two pointers we can just take advantage of the fact that the
>> region is linear and just compute the end based on the start plus the size.
> Why not take advantage of 'the fact that the region is linear' and just
> pre-compute the end in swiotlb_init_with_tbl?
>
> That way the logic in is_swiotlb_buffer is even simpler?
>

Using a pre-computed end point based on a virtual address is more
expensive in the x86_64 case.  The calls to __phys_addr require a
separate function call.  By just using the physical address of the start
and adding the offset I can avoid the second call and the compiler will
take advantage of the smaller function size.  The result is that
is_swiotlb_buffer will be inlined.

Thanks,

Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-04 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-04  0:38 [RFC PATCH 0/7] Improve swiotlb performance by using physical addresses Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] swiotlb: Instead of tracking the end of the swiotlb region just calculate it Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04 13:01   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 15:54     ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2012-10-04 16:31       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] swiotlb: Make io_tlb_start a physical address instead of a virtual address Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04 13:18   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 17:11     ` Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04 17:19       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 20:22         ` Alexander Duyck
2012-10-09 16:43           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-09 19:11             ` Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] swiotlb: Make io_tlb_overflow_buffer a physical address Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04  0:39 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] swiotlb: Return physical addresses when calling swiotlb_tbl_map_single Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04  0:39 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] swiotlb: Use physical addresses for swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04  0:39 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] swiotlb: Use physical addresses instead of virtual in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04  0:39 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] swiotlb: Do not export swiotlb_bounce since there are no external consumers Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04 12:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] Improve swiotlb performance by using physical addresses Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 15:50   ` Alexander Duyck
2012-10-04 13:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 17:57   ` Alexander Duyck
2012-10-05 16:55 ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-05 19:35   ` Alexander Duyck
2012-10-05 20:02     ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-05 23:23       ` Alexander Duyck
2012-10-06 17:57         ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-06 18:56           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-08 15:43           ` Alexander Duyck
2012-10-09 19:05             ` Alexander Duyck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=506DB121.3020700@intel.com \
    --to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).