From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Randy Wright <rwright@hp.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tmac@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix devmem_is_allowed for below 1MB accesses for an efi machine
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:06:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506DFA41.3080803@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506DEC95.8050806@hp.com>
On 10/04/2012 01:07 PM, Randy Wright wrote:
>
> I wanted to mention in this context a patch RFC I posted yesterday as a
> distinct thread which is visible as https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/589
> with the subject: [PATCH RFC] function probe_roms accessing improper
> addresses on UEFI systems.
>
And it's equally as wrong. It has nothing to do with UEFI vs BIOS at
all; this is rather a change in the classic behavior on x86 to return -1
on an impossible read rather than #MC.
Normally I would say probe_roms() doesn't really make any sense in the
EFI context anyway, but I believe there are systems which actually need
to probe at least for the video ROM even when running under EFI (and I
think there are storage devices which have parameter blocks in their
ROMs with similar issues).
Excluding reserved regions in general is a non-option, because on a lot
of systems the ROMs that *do* need to be probed for are marked just
RESERVED.
One option would be to quirk it; obviously there is some piece of
hardware which does cause this #MC and hopefully we could use that to
detect that specific regions should be excluded; another option would be
to trap the #MC during ROM probing.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-04 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <jQim6-6MC-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jQiFt-6UB-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jQoUx-33k-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jQp4d-37r-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <jQpxf-3Cv-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2012-10-04 20:07 ` [PATCH] Fix devmem_is_allowed for below 1MB accesses for an efi machine Randy Wright
2012-10-04 21:06 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-10-02 21:32 T Makphaibulchoke
2012-10-02 21:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-03 4:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2012-10-03 4:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-03 5:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2012-10-03 5:13 ` Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2012-10-03 5:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2012-10-03 5:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-03 5:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506DFA41.3080803@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=rwright@hp.com \
--cc=tmac@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox