public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: rewrite the wrong annotation for select_task_rq_fair()
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:11:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <506FF5CA.2090704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506FF432.201@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 10/06/2012 05:04 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 11:43 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
>> On 09/18/2012 04:16 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>>> The annotation for select_task_rq_fair() is wrong since commit c88d5910, it's
>>> actually for a removed function.
>>>
>>> This patch rewrite the wrong annotation to make it correct.
>>
>> Could I get some comments on this patch?
> 
> Hmm...no comments for a month...is that because there some wrong
> understanding while explain the function or I didn't follow the rule?
> 
> Please let me know if I have made any mistake so I could do better in
> future ;-)

Oh, I just notice Peter is on CC list not the destination...My fault
again...

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 
> Regards,
> Michael Wang
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael Wang
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  kernel/sched/fair.c |   14 ++++++++------
>>>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> index 6b800a1..35eb43a 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> @@ -2682,15 +2682,17 @@ done:
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /*
>>> - * sched_balance_self: balance the current task (running on cpu) in domains
>>> - * that have the 'flag' flag set. In practice, this is SD_BALANCE_FORK and
>>> - * SD_BALANCE_EXEC.
>>> + * select_task_rq_fair:
>>> + *	Select a suitable CPU for task p, in order to keep load balance.
>>>   *
>>> - * Balance, ie. select the least loaded group.
>>> + *	sd_flag:
>>> + *		the domain we try to balance should have "sd_flag" flag set.
>>>   *
>>> - * Returns the target CPU number, or the same CPU if no balancing is needed.
>>> + *	wake_flags:
>>> + *		indicate WF_SYNC.
>>>   *
>>> - * preempt must be disabled.
>>> + *	Must hold p->pi_lock and disable irq before invoke.
>>> + *	Return the CPU number for task p to running on.
>>>   */
>>>  static int
>>>  select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
>>>
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-06  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1347956160-6946-1-git-send-email-wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-09-26  3:43 ` [PATCH] sched: rewrite the wrong annotation for select_task_rq_fair() Michael Wang
2012-10-06  9:04   ` Michael Wang
2012-10-06  9:11     ` Michael Wang [this message]
2012-10-09  2:21 ` Michael Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=506FF5CA.2090704@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox