From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: rewrite the wrong annotation for select_task_rq_fair()
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:11:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506FF5CA.2090704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506FF432.201@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 10/06/2012 05:04 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 11:43 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
>> On 09/18/2012 04:16 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>>> The annotation for select_task_rq_fair() is wrong since commit c88d5910, it's
>>> actually for a removed function.
>>>
>>> This patch rewrite the wrong annotation to make it correct.
>>
>> Could I get some comments on this patch?
>
> Hmm...no comments for a month...is that because there some wrong
> understanding while explain the function or I didn't follow the rule?
>
> Please let me know if I have made any mistake so I could do better in
> future ;-)
Oh, I just notice Peter is on CC list not the destination...My fault
again...
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> Regards,
> Michael Wang
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael Wang
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++++++------
>>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> index 6b800a1..35eb43a 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> @@ -2682,15 +2682,17 @@ done:
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> - * sched_balance_self: balance the current task (running on cpu) in domains
>>> - * that have the 'flag' flag set. In practice, this is SD_BALANCE_FORK and
>>> - * SD_BALANCE_EXEC.
>>> + * select_task_rq_fair:
>>> + * Select a suitable CPU for task p, in order to keep load balance.
>>> *
>>> - * Balance, ie. select the least loaded group.
>>> + * sd_flag:
>>> + * the domain we try to balance should have "sd_flag" flag set.
>>> *
>>> - * Returns the target CPU number, or the same CPU if no balancing is needed.
>>> + * wake_flags:
>>> + * indicate WF_SYNC.
>>> *
>>> - * preempt must be disabled.
>>> + * Must hold p->pi_lock and disable irq before invoke.
>>> + * Return the CPU number for task p to running on.
>>> */
>>> static int
>>> select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-06 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1347956160-6946-1-git-send-email-wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-09-26 3:43 ` [PATCH] sched: rewrite the wrong annotation for select_task_rq_fair() Michael Wang
2012-10-06 9:04 ` Michael Wang
2012-10-06 9:11 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2012-10-09 2:21 ` Michael Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506FF5CA.2090704@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox