public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "\"Jan H. Schönherr\"" <schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: drop ambiguous LOG_CONT flag
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:54:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50732F8A.9090109@cs.tu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPXgP13GCsooDtbor9_OvyDCZjPARL_On_cBtEoxTUWnVsBpvw@mail.gmail.com>

Am 08.10.2012 21:24, schrieb Kay Sievers:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:49 PM, "Jan H. Schönherr"
> 
>>> Given that I'm able to fix the racing case, would you be in favor of
>>> this approach, or should we stick to the earlier version?
>>
>> I'm open to everything that makes sense. Let's see how it looks and we
>> can decide when we have something that passes the tests.
> 
> Jan,
> any updates, did you try something else?
> Or should we merge the first version for now?

I'm working on it, though I cannot spend as much time as I want. :)

My current version does mostly well for race-printk()s, now. But
there's still one issue to resolve and some polishing to do.

If we can afford to wait a little longer, we might get a nicer
solution (and avoid a possible mostly-revert later).

Regards
Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-08 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-26 17:58 [PATCH] printk: drop ambiguous LOG_CONT flag Jan H. Schönherr
2012-09-26 21:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-09-26 22:33   ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-09-27 13:39     ` Kay Sievers
2012-09-27 15:46       ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-09-27 16:04         ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-09-28  8:25           ` Jan H. Schönherr
2012-09-28 14:34             ` Kay Sievers
2012-09-28 14:49               ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-09-28 14:56                 ` Kay Sievers
2012-10-08 19:24                   ` Kay Sievers
2012-10-08 19:54                     ` "Jan H. Schönherr" [this message]
2012-10-08 19:56                       ` Kay Sievers
2012-11-02  3:53                         ` Kay Sievers
2012-11-02 22:37                           ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-11-02 23:36                             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-03 21:12                               ` [PATCH resend] " Jan H. Schönherr
2012-11-10 18:47                                 ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-10-08 23:10                       ` [PATCH] " Joe Perches
2012-09-28  2:28         ` Kay Sievers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50732F8A.9090109@cs.tu-berlin.de \
    --to=schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kay@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox