* [PATCH] regulator: TPS51632: Add tps51632 regulator driver
2012-10-06 15:17 [PATCH 0/5] regulator: tps65090: fix regulator registration and add external control support Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-06 15:17 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:14 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] regulator: tps65090: rename driver name and regulator name Laxman Dewangan
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-06 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie, lrg, sameo; +Cc: vbyravarasu, axel.lin, linux-kernel, Laxman Dewangan
The TPS51632 is a driverless step down controller with
serial control. Advanced features such as D-Cap+
architecture with overlapping pulse support and OSR
overshoot reduction provide fast transient response,
lowest output capacitance and high efficiency.
The TPS51632 supports both I2C and DVFS interfaces
(through PWM) for dynamic control of the output voltage
and current monitor telemetry.
Add regulator driver for TPS51632.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/tps51632-regulator.c | 332 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/regulator/tps51632-regulator.h | 47 ++++
4 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/tps51632-regulator.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/regulator/tps51632-regulator.h
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
index 67d47b5..aa9e8a1 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
@@ -335,6 +335,17 @@ config REGULATOR_PALMAS
on the muxing. This is handled automatically in the driver by
reading the mux info from OTP.
+config REGULATOR_TPS51632
+ tristate "TI TPS51632 Power Regulator"
+ depends on I2C
+ select REGMAP_I2C
+ help
+ This driver supports TPS51632 voltage regulator chip.
+ The TPS52632 is 3-2-1 Phase D-Cap+ Step Down Driverless Controller
+ with Serial VID control and DVFS.
+ The voltage output can be configure through I2C interface or PWM
+ interface.
+
config REGULATOR_TPS6105X
tristate "TI TPS6105X Power regulators"
depends on TPS6105X
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Makefile b/drivers/regulator/Makefile
index e431eed..ec1aec4 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/regulator/Makefile
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MC13783) += mc13783-regulator.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MC13892) += mc13892-regulator.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MC13XXX_CORE) += mc13xxx-regulator-core.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_PALMAS) += palmas-regulator.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_TPS51632) += tps51632-regulator.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_PCAP) += pcap-regulator.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_PCF50633) += pcf50633-regulator.o
obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_RC5T583) += rc5t583-regulator.o
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps51632-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps51632-regulator.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3460364
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps51632-regulator.c
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/*
+ * tps51632-regulator.c -- TI TPS51632
+ *
+ * Regulator driver for TPS51632 3-2-1 Phase D-Cap Step Down Driverless
+ * Controller with serial VID control and DVFS.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2012, NVIDIA Corporation.
+ *
+ * Author: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any kind,
+ * whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
+ * General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
+ * 02111-1307, USA
+ */
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/tps51632-regulator.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+/* Register definitions */
+#define TPS51632_VOLTAGE_SELECT_REG 0x0
+#define TPS51632_VOLTAGE_BASE_REG 0x1
+#define TPS51632_OFFSET_REG 0x2
+#define TPS51632_IMON_REG 0x3
+#define TPS51632_VMAX_REG 0x4
+#define TPS51632_DVFS_CONTROL_REG 0x5
+#define TPS51632_POWER_STATE_REG 0x6
+#define TPS51632_SLEW_REGS 0x7
+#define TPS51632_FAULT_REG 0x14
+
+#define TPS51632_MAX_REG 0x15
+
+#define TPS51632_VOUT_MASK 0x7F
+#define TPS51632_VOUT_OFFSET_MASK 0x1F
+#define TPS51632_VMAX_MASK 0x7F
+#define TPS51632_VMAX_LOCK 0x80
+
+/* TPS51632_DVFS_CONTROL_REG */
+#define TPS51632_DVFS_PWMEN 0x1
+#define TPS51632_DVFS_STEP_20 0x2
+#define TPS51632_DVFS_VMAX_PG 0x4
+#define TPS51632_DVFS_PWMRST 0x8
+#define TPS51632_DVFS_OCA_EN 0x10
+#define TPS51632_DVFS_FCCM 0x20
+
+/* TPS51632_POWER_STATE_REG */
+#define TPS51632_POWER_STATE_MASK 0x03
+#define TPS51632_POWER_STATE_MULTI_PHASE_CCM 0x0
+#define TPS51632_POWER_STATE_SINGLE_PHASE_CCM 0x1
+#define TPS51632_POWER_STATE_SINGLE_PHASE_DCM 0x2
+
+#define TPS51632_MIN_VOLATGE 500000
+#define TPS51632_MAX_VOLATGE 1520000
+#define TPS51632_VOLATGE_STEP_10mV 10000
+#define TPS51632_VOLATGE_STEP_20mV 20000
+#define TPS51632_MAX_VSEL 0x7F
+#define TPS51632_MIN_VSEL 0x19
+#define TPS51632_DEFAULT_RAMP_DELAY 6000
+#define TPS51632_VOLT_VSEL(uV) \
+ (DIV_ROUND_UP(uV - TPS51632_MIN_VOLATGE, \
+ TPS51632_VOLATGE_STEP_10mV) + \
+ TPS51632_MIN_VSEL)
+
+/* TPS51632 chip information */
+struct tps51632_chip {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct regulator_desc desc;
+ struct regulator_dev *rdev;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
+ bool enable_pwm_dvfs;
+};
+
+static int tps51632_dcdc_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+ struct tps51632_chip *tps = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+ unsigned int data;
+ int ret;
+ unsigned int reg = TPS51632_VOLTAGE_SELECT_REG;
+ int vsel;
+
+ if (tps->enable_pwm_dvfs)
+ reg = TPS51632_VOLTAGE_BASE_REG;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(tps->regmap, reg, &data);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(tps->dev, "reg read failed, err %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ vsel = data & TPS51632_VOUT_MASK;
+
+ if (vsel < TPS51632_MIN_VSEL)
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return vsel - TPS51632_MIN_VSEL;
+}
+
+static int tps51632_dcdc_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+ unsigned selector)
+{
+ struct tps51632_chip *tps = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+ int vsel;
+ int ret;
+ unsigned int reg = TPS51632_VOLTAGE_SELECT_REG;
+
+ if (tps->enable_pwm_dvfs)
+ reg = TPS51632_VOLTAGE_BASE_REG;
+
+ vsel = selector + TPS51632_MIN_VSEL;
+ if (vsel > TPS51632_MAX_VSEL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS51632_VOLTAGE_SELECT_REG, vsel);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(tps->dev, "reg write failed, err %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int tps51632_dcdc_set_ramp_delay(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+ int ramp_delay)
+{
+ struct tps51632_chip *tps = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+ int bit = ramp_delay/6000;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (bit)
+ bit--;
+ ret = regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS51632_SLEW_REGS, BIT(bit));
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(tps->dev, "SLEW reg write failed, err %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static struct regulator_ops tps51632_dcdc_ops = {
+ .get_voltage_sel = tps51632_dcdc_get_voltage_sel,
+ .set_voltage_sel = tps51632_dcdc_set_voltage_sel,
+ .list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_linear,
+ .set_voltage_time_sel = regulator_set_voltage_time_sel,
+ .set_ramp_delay = tps51632_dcdc_set_ramp_delay,
+};
+
+static int __devinit tps51632_init_dcdc(struct tps51632_chip *tps,
+ struct tps51632_regulator_platform_data *pdata)
+{
+ int ret;
+ uint8_t control = 0;
+ int vsel;
+
+ if (!pdata->enable_pwm_dvfs)
+ goto skip_pwm_config;
+
+ control |= TPS51632_DVFS_PWMEN;
+ tps->enable_pwm_dvfs = pdata->enable_pwm_dvfs;
+ vsel = TPS51632_VOLT_VSEL(pdata->base_voltage_uV);
+ ret = regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS51632_VOLTAGE_BASE_REG, vsel);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(tps->dev, "BASE reg write failed, err %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (pdata->dvfs_step_20mV)
+ control |= TPS51632_DVFS_STEP_20;
+
+ if (pdata->max_voltage_uV) {
+ unsigned int vmax;
+ /**
+ * TPS51632 hw behavior: VMAX register can be write only
+ * once as it get locked after first write. The lock get
+ * reset only when device is power-reset.
+ * Write register only when lock bit is not enabled.
+ */
+ ret = regmap_read(tps->regmap, TPS51632_VMAX_REG, &vmax);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(tps->dev, "VMAX read failed, err %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ if (!(vmax & TPS51632_VMAX_LOCK)) {
+ vsel = TPS51632_VOLT_VSEL(pdata->max_voltage_uV);
+ ret = regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS51632_VMAX_REG,
+ vsel);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(tps->dev,
+ "VMAX write failed, err %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+skip_pwm_config:
+ ret = regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS51632_DVFS_CONTROL_REG, control);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(tps->dev, "DVFS reg write failed, err %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static bool rd_wr_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+ if ((reg >= 0x8) && (reg <= 0x10))
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
+static const struct regmap_config tps51632_regmap_config = {
+ .reg_bits = 8,
+ .val_bits = 8,
+ .writeable_reg = rd_wr_reg,
+ .readable_reg = rd_wr_reg,
+ .max_register = TPS51632_MAX_REG - 1,
+ .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
+};
+
+static int __devinit tps51632_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+ const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+ struct tps51632_regulator_platform_data *pdata;
+ struct regulator_dev *rdev;
+ struct tps51632_chip *tps;
+ int ret;
+ struct regulator_config config = { };
+
+ pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
+ if (!pdata) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "No Platform data\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ tps = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*tps), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tps) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Memory allocation failed\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ tps->dev = &client->dev;
+ tps->desc.name = id->name;
+ tps->desc.id = 0;
+ tps->desc.ramp_delay = TPS51632_DEFAULT_RAMP_DELAY;
+ tps->desc.min_uV = TPS51632_MIN_VOLATGE;
+ tps->desc.uV_step = TPS51632_VOLATGE_STEP_10mV;
+ tps->desc.n_voltages = (TPS51632_MAX_VSEL - TPS51632_MIN_VSEL) + 1;
+ tps->desc.ops = &tps51632_dcdc_ops;
+ tps->desc.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
+ tps->desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+
+ tps->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tps51632_regmap_config);
+ if (IS_ERR(tps->regmap)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(tps->regmap);
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "regmap init failed, err %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, tps);
+
+ ret = tps51632_init_dcdc(tps, pdata);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(tps->dev, "Init failed, err = %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Register the regulators */
+ config.dev = &client->dev;
+ config.init_data = pdata->reg_init_data;
+ config.driver_data = tps;
+ config.regmap = tps->regmap;
+ config.of_node = client->dev.of_node;
+
+ rdev = regulator_register(&tps->desc, &config);
+ if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
+ dev_err(tps->dev, "regulator register failed\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(rdev);
+ }
+
+ tps->rdev = rdev;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __devexit tps51632_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct tps51632_chip *tps = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+ regulator_unregister(tps->rdev);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct i2c_device_id tps51632_id[] = {
+ {.name = "tps51632",},
+ {},
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tps51632_id);
+
+static struct i2c_driver tps51632_i2c_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "tps51632",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ },
+ .probe = tps51632_probe,
+ .remove = __devexit_p(tps51632_remove),
+ .id_table = tps51632_id,
+};
+
+static int __init tps51632_init(void)
+{
+ return i2c_add_driver(&tps51632_i2c_driver);
+}
+subsys_initcall(tps51632_init);
+
+static void __exit tps51632_cleanup(void)
+{
+ i2c_del_driver(&tps51632_i2c_driver);
+}
+module_exit(tps51632_cleanup);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TPS51632 voltage regulator driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/tps51632-regulator.h b/include/linux/regulator/tps51632-regulator.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d00841e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/tps51632-regulator.h
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * tps51632-regulator.h -- TPS51632 regulator
+ *
+ * Interface for regulator driver for TPS51632 3-2-1 Phase D-Cap Step Down
+ * Driverless Controller with serial VID control and DVFS.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2012 NVIDIA Corporation
+
+ * Author: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
+ * more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
+ * with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
+ * 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifndef __LINUX_REGULATOR_TPS51632_H
+#define __LINUX_REGULATOR_TPS51632_H
+
+/*
+ * struct tps51632_regulator_platform_data - tps51632 regulator platform data.
+ *
+ * @reg_init_data: The regulator init data.
+ * @enable_pwm_dvfs: Enable PWM DVFS or not.
+ * @dvfs_step_20mV: Step for DVFS is 20mV or 10mV.
+ * @max_voltage_uV: Maximum possible voltage in PWM-DVFS mode.
+ * @base_voltage_uV: Base voltage when PWM-DVFS enabled.
+ */
+struct tps51632_regulator_platform_data {
+ struct regulator_init_data *reg_init_data;
+ bool enable_pwm_dvfs;
+ bool dvfs_step_20mV;
+ int max_voltage_uV;
+ int base_voltage_uV;
+};
+
+#endif /* __LINUX_REGULATOR_TPS51632_H */
--
1.7.1.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] regulator: TPS51632: Add tps51632 regulator driver
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH] regulator: TPS51632: Add tps51632 regulator driver Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-09 6:14 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-09 6:07 ` Laxman Dewangan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-10-09 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laxman Dewangan; +Cc: lrg, sameo, vbyravarasu, axel.lin, linux-kernel
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 08:47:46PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Actually...
> + if (pdata->dvfs_step_20mV)
> + control |= TPS51632_DVFS_STEP_20;
> + tps->desc.uV_step = TPS51632_VOLATGE_STEP_10mV;
Shouldn't the dvfs_step_20mV setting affect the uV_step size?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] regulator: TPS51632: Add tps51632 regulator driver
2012-10-09 6:14 ` Mark Brown
@ 2012-10-09 6:07 ` Laxman Dewangan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-09 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: lrg@ti.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, Venu Byravarasu,
axel.lin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 11:44 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 08:47:46PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> Actually...
>
>> + if (pdata->dvfs_step_20mV)
>> + control |= TPS51632_DVFS_STEP_20;
>> + tps->desc.uV_step = TPS51632_VOLATGE_STEP_10mV;
> Shouldn't the dvfs_step_20mV setting affect the uV_step size?
The dvfs_step_20mV will only effect for the control through DVFS (PWM).
The voltage control an voltage base register will till use the 10mV steps.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/5] regulator: tps65090: rename driver name and regulator name
2012-10-06 15:17 [PATCH 0/5] regulator: tps65090: fix regulator registration and add external control support Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH] regulator: TPS51632: Add tps51632 regulator driver Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-06 15:17 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-08 5:53 ` Venu Byravarasu
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator; tps65090: Register all regulators in single probe call Laxman Dewangan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-06 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie, lrg, sameo; +Cc: vbyravarasu, axel.lin, linux-kernel, Laxman Dewangan
To make the names proper and more appropriate:
Rename the driver name from tps65090-regulator to tps65090-pmic.
Rename the regulators from TPS65090_ID_* to TPS65090_REGULATOR_*
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 8 ++++----
include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
index 001ad55..96d59ad 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
@@ -43,14 +43,14 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
#define tps65090_REG(_id) \
{ \
- .id = TPS65090_ID_##_id, \
+ .id = TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id, \
.desc = { \
.name = tps65090_rails(_id), \
- .id = TPS65090_ID_##_id, \
+ .id = TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id, \
.ops = &tps65090_ops, \
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
.owner = THIS_MODULE, \
- .enable_reg = (TPS65090_ID_##_id) + 12, \
+ .enable_reg = (TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id) + 12, \
.enable_mask = BIT(0), \
}, \
}
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int __devexit tps65090_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static struct platform_driver tps65090_regulator_driver = {
.driver = {
- .name = "tps65090-regulator",
+ .name = "tps65090-pmic",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
},
.probe = tps65090_regulator_probe,
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
index 0fa04b6..5e27d4a 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
@@ -24,16 +24,16 @@
#define tps65090_rails(_name) "tps65090_"#_name
enum {
- TPS65090_ID_DCDC1,
- TPS65090_ID_DCDC2,
- TPS65090_ID_DCDC3,
- TPS65090_ID_FET1,
- TPS65090_ID_FET2,
- TPS65090_ID_FET3,
- TPS65090_ID_FET4,
- TPS65090_ID_FET5,
- TPS65090_ID_FET6,
- TPS65090_ID_FET7,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC1,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC2,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC3,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET1,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET2,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET3,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET4,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET5,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET6,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET7,
};
/*
--
1.7.1.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 1/5] regulator: tps65090: rename driver name and regulator name
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] regulator: tps65090: rename driver name and regulator name Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-08 5:53 ` Venu Byravarasu
2012-10-08 6:00 ` Laxman Dewangan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Venu Byravarasu @ 2012-10-08 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laxman Dewangan, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lrg@ti.com,
sameo@linux.intel.com
Cc: axel.lin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laxman Dewangan
> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 8:48 PM
> To: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; lrg@ti.com;
> sameo@linux.intel.com
> Cc: Venu Byravarasu; axel.lin@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Laxman Dewangan
> Subject: [PATCH 1/5] regulator: tps65090: rename driver name and regulator
> name
>
> To make the names proper and more appropriate:
> Rename the driver name from tps65090-regulator to tps65090-pmic.
> Rename the regulators from TPS65090_ID_* to TPS65090_REGULATOR_*
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 8 ++++----
> include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> index 001ad55..96d59ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> @@ -43,14 +43,14 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
>
> #define tps65090_REG(_id) \
> { \
> - .id = TPS65090_ID_##_id, \
> + .id = TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id, \
> .desc = { \
> .name = tps65090_rails(_id), \
> - .id = TPS65090_ID_##_id, \
> + .id = TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id, \
> .ops = &tps65090_ops, \
> .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
> .owner = THIS_MODULE, \
> - .enable_reg = (TPS65090_ID_##_id) + 12, \
> + .enable_reg = (TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id) + 12, \
> .enable_mask = BIT(0), \
> }, \
> }
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int __devexit
> tps65090_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static struct platform_driver tps65090_regulator_driver = {
> .driver = {
> - .name = "tps65090-regulator",
> + .name = "tps65090-pmic",
As the driver itself is regulator driver, why should we rename it to pmic?
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> },
> .probe = tps65090_regulator_probe,
> diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
> b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
> index 0fa04b6..5e27d4a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
> +++ b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
> @@ -24,16 +24,16 @@
> #define tps65090_rails(_name) "tps65090_"#_name
>
> enum {
> - TPS65090_ID_DCDC1,
> - TPS65090_ID_DCDC2,
> - TPS65090_ID_DCDC3,
> - TPS65090_ID_FET1,
> - TPS65090_ID_FET2,
> - TPS65090_ID_FET3,
> - TPS65090_ID_FET4,
> - TPS65090_ID_FET5,
> - TPS65090_ID_FET6,
> - TPS65090_ID_FET7,
> + TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC1,
> + TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC2,
> + TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC3,
> + TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET1,
> + TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET2,
> + TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET3,
> + TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET4,
> + TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET5,
> + TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET6,
> + TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET7,
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 1.7.1.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/5] regulator: tps65090: rename driver name and regulator name
2012-10-08 5:53 ` Venu Byravarasu
@ 2012-10-08 6:00 ` Laxman Dewangan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-08 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Venu Byravarasu
Cc: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lrg@ti.com,
sameo@linux.intel.com, axel.lin@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Monday 08 October 2012 11:23 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Laxman Dewangan
>> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 8:48 PM
>>
>> static struct platform_driver tps65090_regulator_driver = {
>> .driver = {
>> - .name = "tps65090-regulator",
>> + .name = "tps65090-pmic",
> As the driver itself is regulator driver, why should we rename it to pmic?
>
I observed that other drivers are using the similar names
<chip_name>-pmic and so with inline with others.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/5] regulator; tps65090: Register all regulators in single probe call
2012-10-06 15:17 [PATCH 0/5] regulator: tps65090: fix regulator registration and add external control support Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH] regulator: TPS51632: Add tps51632 regulator driver Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] regulator: tps65090: rename driver name and regulator name Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-06 15:17 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:22 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: tps65090: Add support for LDO regulators Laxman Dewangan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-06 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie, lrg, sameo; +Cc: vbyravarasu, axel.lin, linux-kernel, Laxman Dewangan
MFD drier registers the regulator driver once per device and
hence it is require to register all regulators in single probe
call.
Following are details of changes done to achieve this:
- Add max regulator and register all regulators even if there
is no regulator init data from platform.
- Convert regulator init data to pointer type in platform data.
- Add input supply name in regulator desc to provide input supply.
- Separate desc information from driver information.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 137 ++++++++++++++------------
include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h | 1 +
include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h | 8 +-
3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
index 96d59ad..f825fc9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
@@ -27,12 +27,9 @@
#include <linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h>
struct tps65090_regulator {
- int id;
- /* used by regulator core */
- struct regulator_desc desc;
-
- /* Device */
struct device *dev;
+ struct regulator_desc *desc;
+ struct regulator_dev *rdev;
};
static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
@@ -41,46 +38,31 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
.is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
};
-#define tps65090_REG(_id) \
+#define tps65090_REG_DESC(_id, _sname, _en_reg, _ops) \
{ \
- .id = TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id, \
- .desc = { \
- .name = tps65090_rails(_id), \
- .id = TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id, \
- .ops = &tps65090_ops, \
- .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
- .owner = THIS_MODULE, \
- .enable_reg = (TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id) + 12, \
- .enable_mask = BIT(0), \
- }, \
+ .name = tps65090_rails(_id), \
+ .supply_name = _sname, \
+ .id = TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id, \
+ .ops = &_ops, \
+ .enable_reg = _en_reg, \
+ .enable_mask = BIT(0), \
+ .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE, \
}
-static struct tps65090_regulator TPS65090_regulator[] = {
- tps65090_REG(DCDC1),
- tps65090_REG(DCDC2),
- tps65090_REG(DCDC3),
- tps65090_REG(FET1),
- tps65090_REG(FET2),
- tps65090_REG(FET3),
- tps65090_REG(FET4),
- tps65090_REG(FET5),
- tps65090_REG(FET6),
- tps65090_REG(FET7),
+static struct regulator_desc tps65090_regulator_desc[] = {
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC1, "vsys1", 0x0C, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC2, "vsys2", 0x0D, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC3, "vsys3", 0x0E, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET1, "infet1", 0x0F, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET2, "infet2", 0x10, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET3, "infet3", 0x11, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET4, "infet4", 0x12, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET5, "infet5", 0x13, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET6, "infet6", 0x14, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET7, "infet7", 0x15, tps65090_ops),
};
-static inline struct tps65090_regulator *find_regulator_info(int id)
-{
- struct tps65090_regulator *ri;
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(TPS65090_regulator); i++) {
- ri = &TPS65090_regulator[i];
- if (ri->desc.id == id)
- return ri;
- }
- return NULL;
-}
-
static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct tps65090 *tps65090_mfd = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
@@ -88,39 +70,72 @@ static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct regulator_config config = { };
struct regulator_dev *rdev;
struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data *tps_pdata;
- int id = pdev->id;
+ struct tps65090_regulator *pmic;
+ struct tps65090_platform_data *tps65090_pdata;
+ int num;
+ int ret;
- dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Probing regulator %d\n", id);
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Probing regulator\n");
- ri = find_regulator_info(id);
- if (ri == NULL) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid regulator ID specified\n");
+ tps65090_pdata = dev_get_platdata(pdev->dev.parent);
+ if (!tps65090_pdata) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Platform data missing\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- tps_pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
- ri->dev = &pdev->dev;
-
- config.dev = &pdev->dev;
- config.init_data = &tps_pdata->regulator;
- config.driver_data = ri;
- config.regmap = tps65090_mfd->rmap;
-
- rdev = regulator_register(&ri->desc, &config);
- if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register regulator %s\n",
- ri->desc.name);
- return PTR_ERR(rdev);
+
+ pmic = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX * sizeof(*pmic),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pmic) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "mem alloc for pmic failed\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ for (num = 0; num < TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX; num++) {
+ tps_pdata = tps65090_pdata->reg_pdata[num];
+
+ ri = &pmic[num];
+ ri->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ ri->desc = &tps65090_regulator_desc[num];
+
+ config.dev = &pdev->dev;
+ config.driver_data = ri;
+ config.regmap = tps65090_mfd->rmap;
+ if (tps_pdata)
+ config.init_data = tps_pdata->reg_init_data;
+ else
+ config.init_data = NULL;
+
+ rdev = regulator_register(ri->desc, &config);
+ if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register regulator %s\n",
+ ri->desc->name);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(rdev);
+ goto scrub;
+ }
+ ri->rdev = rdev;
}
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rdev);
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmic);
return 0;
+
+scrub:
+ while (--num >= 0) {
+ ri = &pmic[num];
+ regulator_unregister(ri->rdev);
+ }
+ return ret;
}
static int __devexit tps65090_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct regulator_dev *rdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct tps65090_regulator *pmic = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct tps65090_regulator *ri;
+ int num;
- regulator_unregister(rdev);
+ for (num = 0; num < TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX; ++num) {
+ ri = &pmic[num];
+ regulator_unregister(ri->rdev);
+ }
return 0;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h
index 6bc31d8..10f339f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct tps65090_platform_data {
int irq_base;
int num_subdevs;
struct tps65090_subdev_info *subdevs;
+ struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data **reg_pdata;
};
/*
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
index 5e27d4a..3572557 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
@@ -34,17 +34,19 @@ enum {
TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET5,
TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET6,
TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET7,
+
+ /* Last entry */
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX,
};
/*
* struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data
*
- * @regulator: The regulator init data.
- * @slew_rate_uV_per_us: Slew rate microvolt per microsec.
+ * @reg_init_data: The regulator init data.
*/
struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data {
- struct regulator_init_data regulator;
+ struct regulator_init_data *reg_init_data;
};
#endif /* __REGULATOR_TPS65090_H */
--
1.7.1.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator; tps65090: Register all regulators in single probe call
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator; tps65090: Register all regulators in single probe call Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-09 6:22 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-09 6:16 ` Laxman Dewangan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-10-09 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laxman Dewangan; +Cc: lrg, sameo, vbyravarasu, axel.lin, linux-kernel
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 08:47:48PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> MFD drier registers the regulator driver once per device and
> hence it is require to register all regulators in single probe
> call.
> Following are details of changes done to achieve this:
> - Add max regulator and register all regulators even if there
> is no regulator init data from platform.
> - Convert regulator init data to pointer type in platform data.
> - Add input supply name in regulator desc to provide input supply.
> - Separate desc information from driver information.
Shouldn't this be the first commit in the series? Also...
> + for (num = 0; num < TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX; num++) {
> + tps_pdata = tps65090_pdata->reg_pdata[num];
> struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data {
> - struct regulator_init_data regulator;
> + struct regulator_init_data *reg_init_data;
> };
I can't help but think that if we're going to require the full array
here the array should just be declared immediately - perhaps as an array
of pointers:
struct regulator_init_data *reg_init_data[TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX];
to allow things to be missed out. Otherwise we're likely to crash if
the user misses a regulator or something.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator; tps65090: Register all regulators in single probe call
2012-10-09 6:22 ` Mark Brown
@ 2012-10-09 6:16 ` Laxman Dewangan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-09 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: lrg@ti.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, Venu Byravarasu,
axel.lin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 11:52 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 08:47:48PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> MFD drier registers the regulator driver once per device and
> Shouldn't this be the first commit in the series? Also...
Ok, will make this as first commit.
>
> to allow things to be missed out. Otherwise we're likely to crash if
> the user misses a regulator or something.
Agree with your suggestion and for this either I need to move all the
defs of regulator/tps65090-regulator.h to mfd/tps65090.h or include
the regulator header in mfd header.
I will move all this to the mfd header and get rid of regulator header.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] regulator: tps65090: Add support for LDO regulators
2012-10-06 15:17 [PATCH 0/5] regulator: tps65090: fix regulator registration and add external control support Laxman Dewangan
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator; tps65090: Register all regulators in single probe call Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-06 15:17 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: tps65090: Add voltage out level in platform data Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC Laxman Dewangan
5 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-06 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie, lrg, sameo; +Cc: vbyravarasu, axel.lin, linux-kernel, Laxman Dewangan
TPS65090 supports the two LDOs, LDO1 and LDO2. These are
always ON regulators. The output on these LDOs are available
once the input voltage available for these LDOs.
Add support for these LDOs regulators.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 5 +++++
include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
index f825fc9..254ee66 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
.is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
};
+static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ldo_ops = {
+};
+
#define tps65090_REG_DESC(_id, _sname, _en_reg, _ops) \
{ \
.name = tps65090_rails(_id), \
@@ -61,6 +64,8 @@ static struct regulator_desc tps65090_regulator_desc[] = {
tps65090_REG_DESC(FET5, "infet5", 0x13, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG_DESC(FET6, "infet6", 0x14, tps65090_ops),
tps65090_REG_DESC(FET7, "infet7", 0x15, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(LDO1, "vsys_l1", 0, tps65090_ldo_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(LDO2, "vsys_l2", 0, tps65090_ldo_ops),
};
static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
index 3572557..48e3db1 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ enum {
TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET5,
TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET6,
TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET7,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_LDO1,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_LDO2,
/* Last entry */
TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX,
--
1.7.1.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/5] regulator: tps65090: Add voltage out level in platform data
2012-10-06 15:17 [PATCH 0/5] regulator: tps65090: fix regulator registration and add external control support Laxman Dewangan
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: tps65090: Add support for LDO regulators Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-06 15:17 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:26 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC Laxman Dewangan
5 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-06 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie, lrg, sameo; +Cc: vbyravarasu, axel.lin, linux-kernel, Laxman Dewangan
TPS65090's DCDCs and FETs act as switch and so output
voltage can be enable or disable only. The output voltage
of this regulators depends on the input voltage.
Add the voltage parameter to tell the output voltage value
of these rails.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h | 2 +
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
index 254ee66..279154b 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
@@ -27,18 +27,44 @@
#include <linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h>
struct tps65090_regulator {
+ int microvolts;
struct device *dev;
struct regulator_desc *desc;
struct regulator_dev *rdev;
};
+static int tps65090_voltage_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+ struct tps65090_regulator *ri = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+
+ if (ri->microvolts)
+ return ri->microvolts;
+ else
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static int tps65090_voltage_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+ unsigned selector)
+{
+ struct tps65090_regulator *ri = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+
+ if (selector != 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return ri->microvolts;
+}
+
static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
+ .get_voltage = tps65090_voltage_get_voltage,
+ .list_voltage = tps65090_voltage_list_voltage,
.enable = regulator_enable_regmap,
.disable = regulator_disable_regmap,
.is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
};
static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ldo_ops = {
+ .get_voltage = tps65090_voltage_get_voltage,
+ .list_voltage = tps65090_voltage_list_voltage,
};
#define tps65090_REG_DESC(_id, _sname, _en_reg, _ops) \
@@ -105,10 +131,12 @@ static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
config.dev = &pdev->dev;
config.driver_data = ri;
config.regmap = tps65090_mfd->rmap;
- if (tps_pdata)
+ if (tps_pdata) {
+ ri->microvolts = tps_pdata->microvolts;
config.init_data = tps_pdata->reg_init_data;
- else
+ } else {
config.init_data = NULL;
+ }
rdev = regulator_register(ri->desc, &config);
if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
index 48e3db1..0b29ffa 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
@@ -45,10 +45,12 @@ enum {
* struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data
*
* @reg_init_data: The regulator init data.
+ * @microvolts: The rail's voltage level.
*/
struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data {
struct regulator_init_data *reg_init_data;
+ int microvolts;
};
#endif /* __REGULATOR_TPS65090_H */
--
1.7.1.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: tps65090: Add voltage out level in platform data
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: tps65090: Add voltage out level in platform data Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-09 6:26 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-10-09 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laxman Dewangan; +Cc: lrg, sameo, vbyravarasu, axel.lin, linux-kernel
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 08:47:50PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> TPS65090's DCDCs and FETs act as switch and so output
> voltage can be enable or disable only. The output voltage
> of this regulators depends on the input voltage.
> Add the voltage parameter to tell the output voltage value
> of these rails.
This should be using the recently added bypass support - the regualtors
should arrange to always report themselves as bypass (in the case of the
FETs, I'm not 100% sure what you mean for the DCDCs...) and the
framework should be reporting the input voltage for regulators in bypass
mode.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC
2012-10-06 15:17 [PATCH 0/5] regulator: tps65090: fix regulator registration and add external control support Laxman Dewangan
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: tps65090: Add voltage out level in platform data Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-06 15:17 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-08 5:45 ` Venu Byravarasu
2012-10-09 6:28 ` Mark Brown
5 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-06 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie, lrg, sameo; +Cc: vbyravarasu, axel.lin, linux-kernel, Laxman Dewangan
The TPS65090's DCDC outut can also be enable/disable through the
external digital input signal. Add support for enable/disable
either through register access via I2C or through external
control inputs. The external control inputs can be driven through
GPIOs also and hence adding support for passing the GPIO number.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h | 6 +
2 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
index 279154b..e3f130f 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -33,6 +34,18 @@ struct tps65090_regulator {
struct regulator_dev *rdev;
};
+static inline bool is_dcdc(int id)
+{
+ switch (id) {
+ case TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC1:
+ case TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC2:
+ case TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC3:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
static int tps65090_voltage_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
{
struct tps65090_regulator *ri = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
@@ -54,12 +67,17 @@ static int tps65090_voltage_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
return ri->microvolts;
}
-static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
+static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ext_control_ops = {
+ .get_voltage = tps65090_voltage_get_voltage,
+ .list_voltage = tps65090_voltage_list_voltage,
+};
+
+static struct regulator_ops tps65090_reg_contol_ops = {
.get_voltage = tps65090_voltage_get_voltage,
.list_voltage = tps65090_voltage_list_voltage,
- .enable = regulator_enable_regmap,
- .disable = regulator_disable_regmap,
- .is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
+ .enable = regulator_enable_regmap,
+ .disable = regulator_disable_regmap,
+ .is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
};
static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ldo_ops = {
@@ -80,20 +98,76 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ldo_ops = {
}
static struct regulator_desc tps65090_regulator_desc[] = {
- tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC1, "vsys1", 0x0C, tps65090_ops),
- tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC2, "vsys2", 0x0D, tps65090_ops),
- tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC3, "vsys3", 0x0E, tps65090_ops),
- tps65090_REG_DESC(FET1, "infet1", 0x0F, tps65090_ops),
- tps65090_REG_DESC(FET2, "infet2", 0x10, tps65090_ops),
- tps65090_REG_DESC(FET3, "infet3", 0x11, tps65090_ops),
- tps65090_REG_DESC(FET4, "infet4", 0x12, tps65090_ops),
- tps65090_REG_DESC(FET5, "infet5", 0x13, tps65090_ops),
- tps65090_REG_DESC(FET6, "infet6", 0x14, tps65090_ops),
- tps65090_REG_DESC(FET7, "infet7", 0x15, tps65090_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC1, "vsys1", 0x0C, tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC2, "vsys2", 0x0D, tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC3, "vsys3", 0x0E, tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET1, "infet1", 0x0F, tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET2, "infet2", 0x10, tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET3, "infet3", 0x11, tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET4, "infet4", 0x12, tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET5, "infet5", 0x13, tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET6, "infet6", 0x14, tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
+ tps65090_REG_DESC(FET7, "infet7", 0x15, tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
tps65090_REG_DESC(LDO1, "vsys_l1", 0, tps65090_ldo_ops),
tps65090_REG_DESC(LDO2, "vsys_l2", 0, tps65090_ldo_ops),
};
+static int __devinit tps65090_set_ext_control(
+ struct tps65090_regulator *ri, bool enable)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct device *parent = ri->dev->parent;
+ unsigned int reg_en_reg = ri->desc->enable_reg;
+
+ if (enable)
+ ret = tps65090_set_bits(parent, reg_en_reg, 1);
+ else
+ ret = tps65090_clr_bits(parent, reg_en_reg, 1);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(ri->dev, "Error in updating reg 0x%x\n", reg_en_reg);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_disable_ext_control(
+ struct tps65090_regulator *ri,
+ struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data *tps_pdata)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ struct device *parent = ri->dev->parent;
+ unsigned int reg_en_reg = ri->desc->enable_reg;
+
+ /*
+ * First enable output for internal control if require.
+ * And then disable external control.
+ */
+ if (tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.always_on ||
+ tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.boot_on) {
+ ret = tps65090_set_bits(parent, reg_en_reg, 0);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(ri->dev, "Error in set reg 0x%x\n", reg_en_reg);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return tps65090_set_ext_control(ri, false);
+}
+
+static void __devinit tps65090_configure_regulator_config(
+ struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data *tps_pdata,
+ struct regulator_config *config)
+{
+ if (gpio_is_valid(tps_pdata->gpio)) {
+ int gpio_flag = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW;
+
+ if (tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.always_on ||
+ tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.boot_on)
+ gpio_flag = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH;
+
+ config->ena_gpio = tps_pdata->gpio;
+ config->ena_gpio_flags = gpio_flag;
+ }
+}
+
static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct tps65090 *tps65090_mfd = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
@@ -128,6 +202,23 @@ static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ri->dev = &pdev->dev;
ri->desc = &tps65090_regulator_desc[num];
+ /* Configure for external control for DCDC*/
+ if (tps_pdata && is_dcdc(num) && tps_pdata->reg_init_data) {
+ if (tps_pdata->enable_ext_control) {
+ tps65090_configure_regulator_config(
+ tps_pdata, &config);
+ ri->desc->ops = &tps65090_ext_control_ops;
+ } else {
+ ret = tps65090_regulator_disable_ext_control(
+ ri, tps_pdata);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+ "failed disable ext control\n");
+ goto scrub;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
config.dev = &pdev->dev;
config.driver_data = ri;
config.regmap = tps65090_mfd->rmap;
@@ -146,6 +237,17 @@ static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto scrub;
}
ri->rdev = rdev;
+
+ /* Enable external control if it is require */
+ if (tps_pdata && is_dcdc(num) && tps_pdata->reg_init_data &&
+ tps_pdata->enable_ext_control) {
+ ret = tps65090_set_ext_control(ri, true);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ /* Increment num to get unregister rdev */
+ num++;
+ goto scrub;
+ }
+ }
}
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmic);
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
index 0b29ffa..3822136 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
@@ -46,11 +46,17 @@ enum {
*
* @reg_init_data: The regulator init data.
* @microvolts: The rail's voltage level.
+ * @enable_ext_control: Enable extrenal control or not. Only available for
+ * DCDC1, DCDC2 and DCDC3.
+ * @gpio: Gpio number if external control is enabled and controlled through
+ * gpio.
*/
struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data {
struct regulator_init_data *reg_init_data;
int microvolts;
+ bool enable_ext_control;
+ int gpio;
};
#endif /* __REGULATOR_TPS65090_H */
--
1.7.1.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-08 5:45 ` Venu Byravarasu
2012-10-08 5:58 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 6:28 ` Mark Brown
1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Venu Byravarasu @ 2012-10-08 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laxman Dewangan, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lrg@ti.com,
sameo@linux.intel.com
Cc: axel.lin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laxman Dewangan
> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 8:48 PM
> To: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; lrg@ti.com;
> sameo@linux.intel.com
> Cc: Venu Byravarasu; axel.lin@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Laxman Dewangan
> Subject: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for
> DCDC
>
> The TPS65090's DCDC outut can also be enable/disable through the
> external digital input signal. Add support for enable/disable
> either through register access via I2C or through external
> control inputs. The external control inputs can be driven through
> GPIOs also and hence adding support for passing the GPIO number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 130
> +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h | 6 +
> 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> index 279154b..e3f130f 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -33,6 +34,18 @@ struct tps65090_regulator {
> struct regulator_dev *rdev;
> };
>
> +static inline bool is_dcdc(int id)
> +{
> + switch (id) {
> + case TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC1:
> + case TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC2:
> + case TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC3:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int tps65090_voltage_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> {
> struct tps65090_regulator *ri = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> @@ -54,12 +67,17 @@ static int tps65090_voltage_list_voltage(struct
> regulator_dev *rdev,
> return ri->microvolts;
> }
>
> -static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
> +static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ext_control_ops = {
Where tps65090_ext_control_ops are used?
> + .get_voltage = tps65090_voltage_get_voltage,
> + .list_voltage = tps65090_voltage_list_voltage,
> +};
> +
> +static struct regulator_ops tps65090_reg_contol_ops = {
> .get_voltage = tps65090_voltage_get_voltage,
> .list_voltage = tps65090_voltage_list_voltage,
> - .enable = regulator_enable_regmap,
> - .disable = regulator_disable_regmap,
> - .is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
> + .enable = regulator_enable_regmap,
> + .disable = regulator_disable_regmap,
> + .is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
> };
>
> static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ldo_ops = {
> @@ -80,20 +98,76 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ldo_ops = {
> }
>
> static struct regulator_desc tps65090_regulator_desc[] = {
> - tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC1, "vsys1", 0x0C, tps65090_ops),
> - tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC2, "vsys2", 0x0D, tps65090_ops),
> - tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC3, "vsys3", 0x0E, tps65090_ops),
> - tps65090_REG_DESC(FET1, "infet1", 0x0F, tps65090_ops),
> - tps65090_REG_DESC(FET2, "infet2", 0x10, tps65090_ops),
> - tps65090_REG_DESC(FET3, "infet3", 0x11, tps65090_ops),
> - tps65090_REG_DESC(FET4, "infet4", 0x12, tps65090_ops),
> - tps65090_REG_DESC(FET5, "infet5", 0x13, tps65090_ops),
> - tps65090_REG_DESC(FET6, "infet6", 0x14, tps65090_ops),
> - tps65090_REG_DESC(FET7, "infet7", 0x15, tps65090_ops),
> + tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC1, "vsys1", 0x0C,
> tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
> + tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC2, "vsys2", 0x0D,
> tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
> + tps65090_REG_DESC(DCDC3, "vsys3", 0x0E,
> tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
> + tps65090_REG_DESC(FET1, "infet1", 0x0F,
> tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
> + tps65090_REG_DESC(FET2, "infet2", 0x10,
> tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
> + tps65090_REG_DESC(FET3, "infet3", 0x11,
> tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
> + tps65090_REG_DESC(FET4, "infet4", 0x12,
> tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
> + tps65090_REG_DESC(FET5, "infet5", 0x13,
> tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
> + tps65090_REG_DESC(FET6, "infet6", 0x14,
> tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
> + tps65090_REG_DESC(FET7, "infet7", 0x15,
> tps65090_reg_contol_ops),
> tps65090_REG_DESC(LDO1, "vsys_l1", 0, tps65090_ldo_ops),
> tps65090_REG_DESC(LDO2, "vsys_l2", 0, tps65090_ldo_ops),
> };
>
> +static int __devinit tps65090_set_ext_control(
> + struct tps65090_regulator *ri, bool enable)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct device *parent = ri->dev->parent;
> + unsigned int reg_en_reg = ri->desc->enable_reg;
> +
> + if (enable)
> + ret = tps65090_set_bits(parent, reg_en_reg, 1);
> + else
> + ret = tps65090_clr_bits(parent, reg_en_reg, 1);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(ri->dev, "Error in updating reg 0x%x\n", reg_en_reg);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_disable_ext_control(
> + struct tps65090_regulator *ri,
> + struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data *tps_pdata)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct device *parent = ri->dev->parent;
> + unsigned int reg_en_reg = ri->desc->enable_reg;
> +
> + /*
> + * First enable output for internal control if require.
> + * And then disable external control.
> + */
> + if (tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.always_on ||
> + tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.boot_on) {
> + ret = tps65090_set_bits(parent, reg_en_reg, 0);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(ri->dev, "Error in set reg 0x%x\n",
> reg_en_reg);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return tps65090_set_ext_control(ri, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void __devinit tps65090_configure_regulator_config(
> + struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data *tps_pdata,
> + struct regulator_config *config)
> +{
> + if (gpio_is_valid(tps_pdata->gpio)) {
> + int gpio_flag = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW;
> +
> + if (tps_pdata->reg_init_data->constraints.always_on ||
> + tps_pdata->reg_init_data-
> >constraints.boot_on)
> + gpio_flag = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH;
> +
> + config->ena_gpio = tps_pdata->gpio;
> + config->ena_gpio_flags = gpio_flag;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct tps65090 *tps65090_mfd = dev_get_drvdata(pdev-
> >dev.parent);
> @@ -128,6 +202,23 @@ static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> ri->dev = &pdev->dev;
> ri->desc = &tps65090_regulator_desc[num];
>
> + /* Configure for external control for DCDC*/
> + if (tps_pdata && is_dcdc(num) && tps_pdata->reg_init_data)
> {
> + if (tps_pdata->enable_ext_control) {
> + tps65090_configure_regulator_config(
> + tps_pdata, &config);
> + ri->desc->ops = &tps65090_ext_control_ops;
> + } else {
> + ret =
> tps65090_regulator_disable_ext_control(
> + ri, tps_pdata);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "failed disable ext
> control\n");
> + goto scrub;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> config.dev = &pdev->dev;
> config.driver_data = ri;
> config.regmap = tps65090_mfd->rmap;
> @@ -146,6 +237,17 @@ static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> goto scrub;
> }
> ri->rdev = rdev;
> +
> + /* Enable external control if it is require */
> + if (tps_pdata && is_dcdc(num) && tps_pdata->reg_init_data
> &&
> + tps_pdata->enable_ext_control) {
> + ret = tps65090_set_ext_control(ri, true);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + /* Increment num to get unregister rdev */
> + num++;
> + goto scrub;
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmic);
> diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
> b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
> index 0b29ffa..3822136 100644
> --- a/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
> +++ b/include/linux/regulator/tps65090-regulator.h
> @@ -46,11 +46,17 @@ enum {
> *
> * @reg_init_data: The regulator init data.
> * @microvolts: The rail's voltage level.
> + * @enable_ext_control: Enable extrenal control or not. Only available for
> + * DCDC1, DCDC2 and DCDC3.
> + * @gpio: Gpio number if external control is enabled and controlled through
> + * gpio.
> */
>
> struct tps65090_regulator_platform_data {
> struct regulator_init_data *reg_init_data;
> int microvolts;
> + bool enable_ext_control;
> + int gpio;
> };
>
> #endif /* __REGULATOR_TPS65090_H */
> --
> 1.7.1.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC
2012-10-08 5:45 ` Venu Byravarasu
@ 2012-10-08 5:58 ` Laxman Dewangan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-08 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Venu Byravarasu
Cc: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lrg@ti.com,
sameo@linux.intel.com, axel.lin@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Monday 08 October 2012 11:15 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Laxman Dewangan
>> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 8:48 PM
>> To: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com; lrg@ti.com;
>> sameo@linux.intel.com
>> Cc: Venu Byravarasu; axel.lin@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> Laxman Dewangan
>> Subject: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for
>> DCDC
>>
>>
>> static int tps65090_voltage_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> {
>> struct tps65090_regulator *ri = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>> @@ -54,12 +67,17 @@ static int tps65090_voltage_list_voltage(struct
>> regulator_dev *rdev,
>> return ri->microvolts;
>> }
>>
>> -static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
>> +static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ext_control_ops = {
> Where tps65090_ext_control_ops are used?
>
It is used when external control is enabled.
I have the code as
ri->desc->ops = &tps65090_ext_control_ops;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC
2012-10-06 15:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-08 5:45 ` Venu Byravarasu
@ 2012-10-09 6:28 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-09 6:21 ` Laxman Dewangan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-10-09 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laxman Dewangan; +Cc: lrg, sameo, vbyravarasu, axel.lin, linux-kernel
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 08:47:51PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> The TPS65090's DCDC outut can also be enable/disable through the
> external digital input signal. Add support for enable/disable
> either through register access via I2C or through external
> control inputs. The external control inputs can be driven through
> GPIOs also and hence adding support for passing the GPIO number.
There's support for GPIO driven enable lines in the framework already,
this driver should be able to use this happily, this sort of hardware is
exactly the use case it was written for.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC
2012-10-09 6:28 ` Mark Brown
@ 2012-10-09 6:21 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 7:04 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-10-09 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: lrg@ti.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, Venu Byravarasu,
axel.lin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 11:58 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 08:47:51PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> The TPS65090's DCDC outut can also be enable/disable through the
>> external digital input signal. Add support for enable/disable
>> either through register access via I2C or through external
>> control inputs. The external control inputs can be driven through
>> GPIOs also and hence adding support for passing the GPIO number.
> There's support for GPIO driven enable lines in the framework already,
> this driver should be able to use this happily, this sort of hardware is
> exactly the use case it was written for.
yes, I am using the gpio driven enable lines in the framework.
This patch does the some configuration in register to enable external
control and configure the regulator_config (fill gpio related stuff in
config) before registering
the regulator. There is no call of gpio libs from the driver.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC
2012-10-09 6:21 ` Laxman Dewangan
@ 2012-10-09 7:04 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-10-09 7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laxman Dewangan
Cc: lrg@ti.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, Venu Byravarasu,
axel.lin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:51:19AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2012 11:58 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >There's support for GPIO driven enable lines in the framework already,
> >this driver should be able to use this happily, this sort of hardware is
> >exactly the use case it was written for.
> yes, I am using the gpio driven enable lines in the framework.
> This patch does the some configuration in register to enable external
> control and configure the regulator_config (fill gpio related stuff
> in config) before registering
> the regulator. There is no call of gpio libs from the driver.
The code seemed way more complex than that... did you notice the fact
that if a GPIO is specified then the register enable/disable control
will be ignored if provided?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread