From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, miaox@cn.fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:22:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5073FAD1.1000403@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210090259250.24261@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
At 10/09/2012 06:04 PM, David Rientjes Wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Tang Chen wrote:
>
>>>> Eek, the nid shouldn't be -1 yet, though, for cpu hotplug since this
>>>> should be called at CPU_DYING level and migrate_tasks() still sees a valid
>>>> cpu.
>>
>> As Wen said below, nid is now set to -1 when cpu is hotremoved.
>> I reproduce this problem in this situation:
>>
>> all cpus are online, and hot remove a system board directorily, without
>> offlining any cpu.
>>
>> As a result, the removed cpu's nid is set to -1, and this causes
>> problems.
>>
>
> Let's add Andrew to the cc list then, because I'm nacking
> cpu_hotplug-unmap-cpu2node-when-the-cpu-is-hotremoved.patch in the -mm
> tree for this reason.
>
> We can only clear a cpu-to-node mapping when the cpu is completely
> offline, not before or during the CPU_DYING stage. Kernel code, such as
I clear cpu-to-node mapping when the cpu is hotremoved. If the cpu is onlined,
it will be offlined before clearing cpu-to-node mapping.
Here is the code in driver/acpi/processor_driver.c:
=============
static int acpi_processor_handle_eject(struct acpi_processor *pr)
{
if (cpu_online(pr->id))
cpu_down(pr->id); <========== cpu is offlined here.
arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id);
acpi_unmap_lsapic(pr->id); <========== I clear the mapping here.
return (0);
}
=============
The real problem is that: we don't migrate this task to another cpu when
the cpu is offlined. I guess this task is not in running state, and it
is not in the cpu's runqueue.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
> the sched code that you are now trying to "fix", depends on this mapping
> to work correctly; obviously no audit was done of cpu hotplug code
> depending on it before the patch was proposed.
>
> I say "fix" because even this workaround isn't a good solution since it
> would be much better to pick another cpu on the same node as the offlining
> cpu for the runqueue before falling back to the set of all allowed nodes.
> We lose all NUMA affinity information with that patch. There's no reason
> why we shouldn't know the node of a cpu that is being offlined.
>
> So nack to cpu_hotplug-unmap-cpu2node-when-the-cpu-is-hotremoved.patch.
> After it's removed because it's buggy, this "fix" will no longer be
> necessary.
>
This patch is try to fix a bug: the kernel will be panicked after removing a
node.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-09 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-08 2:59 [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node Tang Chen
2012-10-09 6:21 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 8:34 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-09 8:39 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-09 10:04 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 10:22 ` Wen Congyang [this message]
2012-10-09 20:00 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-09 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 20:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-09 23:27 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-10 2:06 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10 3:48 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-10 9:33 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-10 10:10 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-10 20:30 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-10 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-10 20:57 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-18 0:52 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-18 2:51 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-18 3:29 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5073FAD1.1000403@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox