public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, miaox@cn.fujitsu.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:06:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5074D824.6020204@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210091617260.10143@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

At 10/10/2012 07:27 AM, David Rientjes Wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
>> Well the code they were patching is in the wakeup path. As I think Tang
>> said, we leave !runnable tasks on whatever cpu they ran on last, even if
>> that cpu is offlined, we try and fix up state when we get a wakeup.
>>
>> On wakeup, it tries to find a cpu to run on and will try a cpu of the
>> same node first.
>>
>> Now if that node's entirely gone away, it appears the cpu_to_node() map
>> will not return a valid node number.
>>
>> I think that's a change in behaviour, it didn't used to do that afaik.
>> Certainly this code hasn't change in a while.
>>
> 
> If cpu_to_node() always returns a valid node id even if all cpus on the 
> node are offline, then the cpumask_of_node() implementation, which the 
> sched code is using, should either return an empty cpumask (if 
> node_to_cpumask_map[nid] isn't freed) or cpu_online_mask.  The change in 
> behavior here occurred because 
> cpu_hotplug-unmap-cpu2node-when-the-cpu-is-hotremoved.patch in -mm doesn't 
> return a valid node id and forces it to return -1 so a kzalloc_node(..., 
> -1) fallsback to allocate anywhere.
> 
> But if you only need cpu_to_node() when waking up to find a runnable cpu 
> for this NUMA information, then I think you can just change the 
> kzalloc_node() in alloc_{fair,rt}_sched_group() to do 
> kzalloc(..., cpu_online(cpu) ? cpu_to_node(cpu) : NUMA_NO_NODE).
> 
>  [ The changelog here is confusing because it's fixing a problem in 
>    linux-next without saying so. ]
> 

I don't agree with this way. Because it only fix the code which causes a
problem, and we can't say there is no any similar problem. So it is
why I clear the cpu-to-node mapping.

What about the following solution:
1. clear the cpu-to-node mapping when the node is offlined
2. tang's patch is still necessary because we leave !runnable tasks on
   whatever cpu they ran on last. If cpu's node is NUMA_NO_NODE, it means
   the entire node is offlined, and we must migrate the task to the other
   node.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-10  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-08  2:59 [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node Tang Chen
2012-10-09  6:21 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09  8:34   ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-09  8:39     ` Tang Chen
2012-10-09 10:04       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 10:22         ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-09 20:00           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-09 20:36   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 20:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-09 23:27       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-10  2:06         ` Wen Congyang [this message]
2012-10-10  3:48           ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10  9:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-10  9:33           ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10  9:51             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-10 10:10               ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10 10:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-10 20:30           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-10 20:37             ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-10 20:57               ` David Rientjes
2012-10-18  0:52                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-18  2:51                   ` Tang Chen
2012-10-18  3:29                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19 11:18                       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5074D824.6020204@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox