From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, miaox@cn.fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node.
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:06:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5074D824.6020204@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210091617260.10143@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
At 10/10/2012 07:27 AM, David Rientjes Wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> Well the code they were patching is in the wakeup path. As I think Tang
>> said, we leave !runnable tasks on whatever cpu they ran on last, even if
>> that cpu is offlined, we try and fix up state when we get a wakeup.
>>
>> On wakeup, it tries to find a cpu to run on and will try a cpu of the
>> same node first.
>>
>> Now if that node's entirely gone away, it appears the cpu_to_node() map
>> will not return a valid node number.
>>
>> I think that's a change in behaviour, it didn't used to do that afaik.
>> Certainly this code hasn't change in a while.
>>
>
> If cpu_to_node() always returns a valid node id even if all cpus on the
> node are offline, then the cpumask_of_node() implementation, which the
> sched code is using, should either return an empty cpumask (if
> node_to_cpumask_map[nid] isn't freed) or cpu_online_mask. The change in
> behavior here occurred because
> cpu_hotplug-unmap-cpu2node-when-the-cpu-is-hotremoved.patch in -mm doesn't
> return a valid node id and forces it to return -1 so a kzalloc_node(...,
> -1) fallsback to allocate anywhere.
>
> But if you only need cpu_to_node() when waking up to find a runnable cpu
> for this NUMA information, then I think you can just change the
> kzalloc_node() in alloc_{fair,rt}_sched_group() to do
> kzalloc(..., cpu_online(cpu) ? cpu_to_node(cpu) : NUMA_NO_NODE).
>
> [ The changelog here is confusing because it's fixing a problem in
> linux-next without saying so. ]
>
I don't agree with this way. Because it only fix the code which causes a
problem, and we can't say there is no any similar problem. So it is
why I clear the cpu-to-node mapping.
What about the following solution:
1. clear the cpu-to-node mapping when the node is offlined
2. tang's patch is still necessary because we leave !runnable tasks on
whatever cpu they ran on last. If cpu's node is NUMA_NO_NODE, it means
the entire node is offlined, and we must migrate the task to the other
node.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-10 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-08 2:59 [PATCH] Do not use cpu_to_node() to find an offlined cpu's node Tang Chen
2012-10-09 6:21 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 8:34 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-09 8:39 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-09 10:04 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 10:22 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-09 20:00 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-09 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09 20:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-09 23:27 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-10 2:06 ` Wen Congyang [this message]
2012-10-10 3:48 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-10 9:33 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-10 10:10 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-10 20:30 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-10 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-10 20:57 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-18 0:52 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-18 2:51 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-18 3:29 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5074D824.6020204@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox