public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: Refactor gpio_export
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:41:13 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507DF099.1010504@gmail.com> (raw)

The gpio_export function uses nested if statements and the status
variable to handle the failure cases. This makes the function logic
difficult to follow. Refactor the code to abort immediately on failure
using goto. This makes the code slightly longer, but significantly
reduces the nesting and number of split lines and makes the code easier
to read.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon
---

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 5d6c71e..a142246 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -702,68 +702,74 @@ int gpio_export(unsigned gpio, bool direction_may_change)
 {
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	struct gpio_desc	*desc;
-	int			status = -EINVAL;
+	int			status;
 	const char		*ioname = NULL;
+	struct device		*dev;
 
 	/* can't export until sysfs is available ... */
 	if (!gpio_class.p) {
 		pr_debug("%s: called too early!\n", __func__);
-		return -ENOENT;
+		status = -ENOENT;
+		goto fail;
 	}
 
-	if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
-		goto done;
+	if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
+		status = -EINVAL;
+		goto fail;
+	}
 
 	mutex_lock(&sysfs_lock);
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 	desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
-	if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags)
-			&& !test_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags)) {
-		status = 0;
-		if (!desc->chip->direction_input
-				|| !desc->chip->direction_output)
-			direction_may_change = false;
+	if (!test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) ||
+	     test_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags)) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
+		status = -ENOENT;
+		goto fail;
 	}
+
+	if (!desc->chip->direction_input || !desc->chip->direction_output)
+		direction_may_change = false;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	if (desc->chip->names && desc->chip->names[gpio - desc->chip->base])
 		ioname = desc->chip->names[gpio - desc->chip->base];
 
-	if (status == 0) {
-		struct device	*dev;
-
-		dev = device_create(&gpio_class, desc->chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0),
-				desc, ioname ? ioname : "gpio%u", gpio);
-		if (!IS_ERR(dev)) {
-			status = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj,
-						&gpio_attr_group);
-
-			if (!status && direction_may_change)
-				status = device_create_file(dev,
-						&dev_attr_direction);
-
-			if (!status && gpio_to_irq(gpio) >= 0
-					&& (direction_may_change
-						|| !test_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT,
-							&desc->flags)))
-				status = device_create_file(dev,
-						&dev_attr_edge);
-
-			if (status != 0)
-				device_unregister(dev);
-		} else
-			status = PTR_ERR(dev);
-		if (status == 0)
-			set_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags);
+	dev = device_create(&gpio_class, desc->chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0),
+			    desc, ioname ? ioname : "gpio%u", gpio);
+	if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
+		status = PTR_ERR(dev);
+		goto fail_unlock;
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&sysfs_lock);
-
-done:
+	status = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &gpio_attr_group);
 	if (status)
-		pr_debug("%s: gpio%d status %d\n", __func__, gpio, status);
+		goto fail_unregister_device;
+
+	if (direction_may_change) {
+		status = device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_direction);
+		if (status)
+			goto fail_unregister_device;
+	}
 
+	if (gpio_to_irq(gpio) >= 0 && (direction_may_change ||
+				       !test_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags))) {
+		status = device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_edge);
+		if (status)
+			goto fail_unregister_device;
+	}
+
+	set_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags);
+	mutex_unlock(&sysfs_lock);
+	return 0;
+
+fail_unregister_device:
+	device_unregister(dev);
+fail_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&sysfs_lock);
+fail:
+	pr_debug("%s: gpio%d status %d\n", __func__, gpio, status);
 	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_export);


             reply	other threads:[~2012-10-16 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-16 23:41 Ryan Mallon [this message]
2012-10-19 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: Refactor gpio_export Linus Walleij
2012-10-19 22:14   ` Ryan Mallon
2012-10-19 22:43     ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=507DF099.1010504@gmail.com \
    --to=rmallon@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox