* [PATCH] sched: allow unsetting SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK when new policy is not realtime
@ 2012-10-17 21:18 Maarten Lankhorst
2012-10-17 21:41 ` Maarten Lankhorst
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2012-10-17 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lennart Poettering; +Cc: LKML
When implementing SIGXCPU handling for a thread boosted with rtkit to realtime
priority, I noticed that sched_setscheduler(somepid, SCHED_OTHER) would return
-EPERM because the thread was previously SCHED_RR | SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK,
and looking from the code that flag cannot be reset without sufficient rights.
sched_setscheduler(somepid, SCHED_OTHER | SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK) which worked,
and seems to be the only way to remove realtime priority set by rtkit on all
kernels since the patch was introduced.
This patch allows SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK to be removed when the user sets a new
policy on itself without realtime.
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> [v2.6.32+]
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 2d8927f..4c0712a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3757,6 +3757,12 @@ recheck:
if (param->sched_priority > p->rt_priority &&
param->sched_priority > rlim_rtprio)
return -EPERM;
+
+ /* Normal users shall not reset the
+ * sched_reset_on_fork flag
+ */
+ if (p->sched_reset_on_fork && !reset_on_fork)
+ return -EPERM;
}
/*
@@ -3771,10 +3777,6 @@ recheck:
/* can't change other user's priorities */
if (!check_same_owner(p))
return -EPERM;
-
- /* Normal users shall not reset the sched_reset_on_fork flag */
- if (p->sched_reset_on_fork && !reset_on_fork)
- return -EPERM;
}
if (user) {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sched: allow unsetting SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK when new policy is not realtime
2012-10-17 21:18 [PATCH] sched: allow unsetting SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK when new policy is not realtime Maarten Lankhorst
@ 2012-10-17 21:41 ` Maarten Lankhorst
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2012-10-17 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lennart Poettering; +Cc: LKML
Op 17-10-12 23:18, Maarten Lankhorst schreef:
> When implementing SIGXCPU handling for a thread boosted with rtkit to realtime
> priority, I noticed that sched_setscheduler(somepid, SCHED_OTHER) would return
> -EPERM because the thread was previously SCHED_RR | SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK,
> and looking from the code that flag cannot be reset without sufficient rights.
>
Argh must not send patches right before going to bed, this leaves open a hole
if current policy is sched_idle and when nice level is at a privileged level still..
Not that I've ever seen nice level do anything. Will resend after I've had some sleep.
~Maarten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-17 21:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-17 21:18 [PATCH] sched: allow unsetting SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK when new policy is not realtime Maarten Lankhorst
2012-10-17 21:41 ` Maarten Lankhorst
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox