linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	bhutchings@solarflare.com,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.7 v2] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when reading numa_maps
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:06:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507F803A.8000900@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210171428540.20712@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

(2012/10/18 6:31), David Rientjes wrote:
> As a result of commit 32f8516a8c73 ("mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack
> contents in numa_maps"), the mutex protecting a shared policy can be
> inadvertently taken while holding task_lock(task).
>
> Recently, commit b22d127a39dd ("mempolicy: fix a race in
> shared_policy_replace()") switched the spinlock within a shared policy to
> a mutex so sp_alloc() could block.  Thus, a refcount must be grabbed on
> all mempolicies returned by get_vma_policy() so it isn't freed while being
> passed to mpol_to_str() when reading /proc/pid/numa_maps.
>
> This patch only takes task_lock() while dereferencing task->mempolicy in
> get_vma_policy() if it's non-NULL in the lockess check to increment its
> refcount.  This ensures it will remain in memory until dropped by
> __mpol_put() after mpol_to_str() is called.
>
> Refcounts of shared policies are grabbed by the ->get_policy() function of
> the vma, all others will be grabbed directly in get_vma_policy().  Now
> that this is done, all callers now unconditionally drop the refcount.
>

please add original problem description....

from your 1st patch.
> When reading /proc/pid/numa_maps, it's possible to return the contents of
> the stack where the mempolicy string should be printed if the policy gets
> freed from beneath us.
>
> This happens because mpol_to_str() may return an error the
> stack-allocated buffer is then printed without ever being stored.
.....

Hmm, I've read the whole thread again...and, I'm sorry if I misunderstand something.

I think Kosaki mentioned the commit 52cd3b0740. It avoids refcounting in get_vma_policy()
because it's called every time alloc_pages_vma() is called, at every page fault.
So, it seems he doesn't agree this fix because of performance concern on big NUMA,


Can't we have another way to fix ? like this ? too ugly ?
Again, I'm sorry if I misunderstand the points.

==

 From bfe7e2ab1c1375b134ec12efce6517149318f75d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:17:25 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] hold task->mempolicy while numa_maps scans.

  /proc/<pid>/numa_maps scans vma and show mempolicy under
  mmap_sem. It sometimes accesses task->mempolicy which can
  be freed without mmap_sem and numa_maps can show some
  garbage while scanning.

This patch tries to take reference count of task->mempolicy at reading
numa_maps before calling get_vma_policy(). By this, task->mempolicy
will not be freed until numa_maps reaches its end.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
  fs/proc/task_mmu.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 14df880..d92e868 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ static void vma_stop(struct proc_maps_private *priv, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  {
  	if (vma && vma != priv->tail_vma) {
  		struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+		task_lock(priv->task);
+		__mpol_put(priv->task->mempolicy);
+		task_unlock(priv->task);
+#endif
  		up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
  		mmput(mm);
  	}
@@ -130,6 +135,16 @@ static void *m_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
  		return mm;
  	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
  
+	/*
+	 * task->mempolicy can be freed even if mmap_sem is down (see kernel/exit.c)
+	 * We grab refcount for stable access.
+	 * repleacement of task->mmpolicy is guarded by mmap_sem.
+	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+	task_lock(priv->task);
+	mpol_get(priv->task->mempolicy);
+	task_unlock(priv->task);
+#endif
  	tail_vma = get_gate_vma(priv->task->mm);
  	priv->tail_vma = tail_vma;
  
@@ -161,6 +176,11 @@ out:
  
  	/* End of vmas has been reached */
  	m->version = (tail_vma != NULL)? 0: -1UL;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+	task_lock(priv->task);
+	__mpol_put(priv->task->mempolicy);
+	task_unlock(priv->task);
+#endif
  	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
  	mmput(mm);
  	return tail_vma;
-- 
1.7.10.2














  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-18  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-08 15:09 mpol_to_str revisited Dave Jones
2012-10-08 15:15 ` Dave Jones
2012-10-08 20:46   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-08 20:35 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-08 20:52   ` Dave Jones
2012-10-16  0:48     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09  0:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-16  2:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16  3:58   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16  5:10     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16  6:10       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16 23:39         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  0:12           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  0:31             ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack contents in numa_maps David Rientjes
2012-10-17  1:38               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  1:49                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  1:53                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  4:05               ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17  5:24                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  5:42                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-17  8:49                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17 19:50                       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 21:05                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17 21:27                           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 18:14                   ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 19:21                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:32                       ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 19:38                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:45                           ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 20:28                             ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when reading numa_maps David Rientjes
2012-10-17 21:31                               ` [patch for-3.7 v2] " David Rientjes
2012-10-18  4:06                                 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-10-18  4:14                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-18  4:41                                     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18  4:34                                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18 20:03                                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19  8:35                                       ` [patch for-3.7 v3] mm, mempolicy: hold task->mempolicy refcount while " Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-19  9:28                                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-22  2:47                                           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-22 20:55                                             ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-22 20:56                                             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19 19:15                                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19  6:51                                     ` [patch for-3.7 v2] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when " KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-18  4:35                                   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-24 23:30                   ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack contents in numa_maps Sasha Levin
2012-10-24 23:34                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-24 23:37                       ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-25  0:08                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25  0:54                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-25  1:15                             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25 12:19                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-25 14:39                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-25 17:23                               ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-25 20:22                               ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25 23:09                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-26  8:48                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-31 18:29                                   ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-21  0:59                                     ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-17  1:33             ` mpol_to_str revisited KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=507F803A.8000900@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).