linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Zhang, Jun" <jun.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] To crash dump, we need keep other memory type except E820_RAM, because other type come from BIOS or firmware is used by other code(for example: PCI_MMCONFIG).
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:38:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5090AB3C.5050405@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88DC34334CA3444C85D647DBFA962C270FD7EB0B@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On 10/30/2012 08:39 PM, Zhang, Jun wrote:
> Hello, Anvin
> Thanks!
>
> Hello, all
> Next is my the latest version, please review it.
> Thanks!

You're still starting in the wrong end which is confusing for the reader.

What you probably want to say is something more like:

"We are doing a crash dump, so remove all RAM ranges as they are the 
ones that need to be dumped.  We still need all non-RAM information in 
order to do I/O."

At that point it should be pretty obvious that the patch is wrong.  What 
if we are *not* doing a crash dump?  Just because crash dump is compiled 
in doesn't mean that that is what we are doing right now.

	-hpa

>  From 141546c77ff7be523a9e72f5259df4a6827f2c1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: jzha144 <jun.zhang@intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:51:18 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] If we are doing a crash dump, we still need non-E820_RAM
>   memory type address information, which come from BIOS or
>   firmware. for example: PCI_MMCONFIG check this address.
>
> Signed-off-by: jzha144 <jun.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/e820.c |    9 +++++++++
>   1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index df06ade..f8672d0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -851,6 +851,15 @@ static int __init parse_memmap_opt(char *p)
>   		 * reset.
>   		 */
>   		saved_max_pfn = e820_end_of_ram_pfn();
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If we are doing a crash dump, we still need non-E820_RAM
> +		 * memory type address information. so we only remove
> +		 * E820_RAM type.
> +		 */
> +		e820_remove_range(0, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM, 1);
> +		userdef = 1;
> +		return 0;
>   #endif
>   		e820.nr_map = 0;
>   		userdef = 1;
>


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-31  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-31  1:26 [PATCH] To crash dump, we need keep other memory type except E820_RAM, because other type come from BIOS or firmware is used by other code(for example: PCI_MMCONFIG) Zhang, Jun
2012-10-31  2:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-31  3:39   ` Zhang, Jun
2012-10-31  4:38     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-10-31  5:22       ` Zhang, Jun
2012-10-31  5:38         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-01  2:15           ` Zhang, Jun
2012-11-01  4:20             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-01  8:49               ` Zhang, Jun
2012-11-02 15:08                 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-11-02 16:37                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-05  1:37                   ` [PATCH] crash dump: don't delete non-E820_RAM during init Zhang, Jun
2012-11-05  2:39                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-05  2:57                       ` Zhang, Jun
2012-11-05  2:59                         ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5090AB3C.5050405@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jun.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).