linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: lizefan@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.cz,
	bsingharora@gmail.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] cgroup: use cgroup_lock_live_group(parent) in cgroup_create()
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 18:37:34 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5093945E.3050504@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351657365-25055-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

(2012/10/31 13:22), Tejun Heo wrote:
> This patch makes cgroup_create() fail if @parent is marked removed.
> This is to prepare for further updates to cgroup_rmdir() path.
> 
> Note that this change isn't strictly necessary.  cgroup can only be
> created via mkdir and the removed marking and dentry removal happen
> without releasing cgroup_mutex, so cgroup_create() can never race with
> cgroup_rmdir().  Even after the scheduled updates to cgroup_rmdir(),
> cgroup_mkdir() and cgroup_rmdir() are synchronized by i_mutex
> rendering the added liveliness check unnecessary.
> 
> Do it anyway such that locking is contained inside cgroup proper and
> we don't get nasty surprises if we ever grow another caller of
> cgroup_create().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

I welcome this change.

Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

> ---
>   kernel/cgroup.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index a49cdbc..b3010ae 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -3906,6 +3906,18 @@ static long cgroup_create(struct cgroup *parent, struct dentry *dentry,
>   	if (!cgrp)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Only live parents can have children.  Note that the liveliness
> +	 * check isn't strictly necessary because cgroup_mkdir() and
> +	 * cgroup_rmdir() are fully synchronized by i_mutex; however, do it
> +	 * anyway so that locking is contained inside cgroup proper and we
> +	 * don't get nasty surprises if we ever grow another caller.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cgroup_lock_live_group(parent)) {
> +		err = -ENODEV;
> +		goto err_free;
> +	}
> +
>   	/* Grab a reference on the superblock so the hierarchy doesn't
>   	 * get deleted on unmount if there are child cgroups.  This
>   	 * can be done outside cgroup_mutex, since the sb can't
> @@ -3913,8 +3925,6 @@ static long cgroup_create(struct cgroup *parent, struct dentry *dentry,
>   	 * fs */
>   	atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
>   
> -	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
> -
>   	init_cgroup_housekeeping(cgrp);
>   
>   	cgrp->parent = parent;
> @@ -3985,7 +3995,7 @@ static long cgroup_create(struct cgroup *parent, struct dentry *dentry,
>   
>   	/* Release the reference count that we took on the superblock */
>   	deactivate_super(sb);
> -
> +err_free:
>   	kfree(cgrp);
>   	return err;
>   }
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-02  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-31  4:22 [PATCHSET] cgroup: simplify cgroup removal path Tejun Heo
2012-10-31  4:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] cgroup: kill cgroup_subsys->__DEPRECATED_clear_css_refs Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 13:21   ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-31 16:38     ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 14:37   ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-31 16:41     ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 16:48       ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-31 17:22         ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02  9:23   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-31  4:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] cgroup: kill CSS_REMOVED Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 15:39   ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-31 16:57     ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 17:06       ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-31 17:10         ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 17:19           ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-31 17:25             ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 17:38               ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-31 17:44                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 17:39               ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-31 19:16       ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-31 19:33         ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02  9:30   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-31  4:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] cgroup: use cgroup_lock_live_group(parent) in cgroup_create() Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 15:55   ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-31 17:04     ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-01  9:16       ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-01 14:52         ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-01 15:05           ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-01 15:15             ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-01 15:43               ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02  9:37   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-10-31  4:22 ` [PATCH 4/8] cgroup: deactivate CSS's and mark cgroup dead before invoking ->pre_destroy() Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 13:42   ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-31 16:05   ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-02  9:43   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-31  4:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] cgroup: remove CGRP_WAIT_ON_RMDIR, cgroup_exclude_rmdir() and cgroup_release_and_wakeup_rmdir() Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 16:27   ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-31 17:16     ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-02  9:53   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-31  4:22 ` [PATCH 6/8] memcg: make mem_cgroup_reparent_charges non failing Tejun Heo
2012-11-02  9:54   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-31  4:22 ` [PATCH 7/8] hugetlb: do not fail in hugetlb_cgroup_pre_destroy Tejun Heo
2012-11-02  9:56   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-31  4:22 ` [PATCH 8/8] cgroup: make ->pre_destroy() return void Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 13:57   ` Vivek Goyal
2012-10-31 16:28   ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-02  9:57   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-31 13:49 ` [PATCHSET] cgroup: simplify cgroup removal path Glauber Costa
2012-10-31 17:18   ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 17:24     ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-31 17:26       ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 17:33         ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-31 16:31 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-31 16:35   ` Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-31 18:16 [PATCHSET v2] " Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 18:16 ` [PATCH 3/8] cgroup: use cgroup_lock_live_group(parent) in cgroup_create() Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 19:44 [PATCHSET RESEND v2] cgroup: simplify cgroup removal path Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 19:44 ` [PATCH 3/8] cgroup: use cgroup_lock_live_group(parent) in cgroup_create() Tejun Heo
2012-11-02 10:03   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-05  5:36   ` Li Zefan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5093945E.3050504@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).