From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932493Ab2KNEJp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:09:45 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16913 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932268Ab2KNEJo (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:09:44 -0500
Message-ID: <50A31971.6000706@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:09:21 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/31] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing V2
References: <1352805180-1607-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20121113151416.GA20044@gmail.com> <20121113154215.GD8218@suse.de> <20121113172734.GA12098@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121113172734.GA12098@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 11/13/2012 12:27 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
>
>>> I'd also like to add another, structural side note: you
>>> mixed new vm-stats bits into the whole queue, needlessly
>>> blowing up the size and the mm/ specific portions of the
>>> tree. I'd suggest to post and keep those bits separately,
>>> preferably on top of what we have already once it has
>>> settled down. I'm keeping the 'perf bench numa' bits
>>> separate as well.
>>
>> The stats part are fairly late in the queue. I noticed they
>> break build for !CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA but it was trivially
>> resolved. [...]
>
> Ok - the vm-stats bits are the last larger item remaining that
> I've seen - could you please redo any of your changes on top of
> the latest tip:numa/core tree, to make them easier for me to
> pick up?
 >
> Your tree is slowly becoming a rebase of tip:numa/core and that
> will certainly cause problems.

Mel's tree looks like the easiest of the two to merge
from an mm/ point of view.

> I'll backmerge any delta patches and rebase as necessary - but
> please do them as deltas on top of tip:numa/core to make things
> reviewable and easier to merge:
>
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git numa/core
>
> Thanks!
>
> 	Ingo
>


-- 
All rights reversed