public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/2] kbuild: centralize .dts->.dtb rule
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:31:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A5350A.3070109@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6tZOjMXR6CNDzDTSUkcERLiX-2+Qoad0bcPum5Z-Jxaaw@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/15/2012 11:20 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> On 11/15/2012 04:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> Grant Likely wrote:
>>>> Or how about: I could pick up the patch with only the MIPS hunk and
>>>> every other user can be fixed up independently to use the new rule.
>>>
>>> Here's a trial patch to fix up ARM. Does this look correct? This patch
>>> depends on the generic dtb build rule already being applied.
>>
>> I think the patch looks OK technically, except for one minor comment below.
>>
>> One issue with this patch is that it moves *.dts from arch/arm/boot to
>> arch/arm/boot/dts, which means everyone has to adjust their scripts/...
>> that package/install/... the kernel. I guess it's an easy change for
>> people to make, but could easily catch people unawares if they do
>> incremental builds so that arch/arm/boot/*.dtb still exists but is stale.
> 
> True. We could temporarily remove or rename if the same file exists in
> the directory below to help people catch that problem. I really would
> like to clean up that build rule to be consistent though.
> 
> The other option is to move all the .dts files into the boot
> directory, but I don't think that is a good idea at all.

Maybe we can just add "rm *.dtb" to the following rules in
boot/Makefile, before calling the child make?

%.dtb: scripts
-	$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) MACHINE=$(MACHINE) $(boot)/$@
+	$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot)/dts MACHINE=$(MACHINE) $(boot)/dts/$@

 dtbs: scripts
-	$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) MACHINE=$(MACHINE) $(boot)/$@
+	$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot)/dts MACHINE=$(MACHINE) dtbs

>>> +targets += dtbs
>>
>> Doesn't that make the "dtbs" target always run by default? Perhaps
>> that's reasonable though, and doesn't actually affect anything since the
>> make command for this directory always specifies an explicit target?
>>
>> Or, was that meant to be the following that got removed from ../Makefile?
>>
>> targets += $(dtb-y)
> 
> Yes it is supposed to be the same thing. Doesn't it effectively do the
> same since dtbs depends on $(dtb-y)?

Ah, I think so yes.

I guess anyway that $(targets) is presumably ignored if an explicit
build target is requested from make.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-15 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-31 22:10 [PATCH V5 1/2] kbuild: centralize .dts->.dtb rule Stephen Warren
2012-10-31 22:10 ` [PATCH V5 2/2] kbuild: run the pre-processor on *.dts files Stephen Warren
2012-11-01 20:31   ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-11-01 20:30 ` [PATCH V5 1/2] kbuild: centralize .dts->.dtb rule Sam Ravnborg
2012-11-02  9:58 ` Ralf Baechle
2012-11-02 10:23   ` Ralf Baechle
2012-11-02 15:00     ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-15 10:15     ` Grant Likely
2012-11-15 10:32       ` Grant Likely
2012-11-15 11:51         ` Grant Likely
2012-11-15 18:09           ` Stephen Warren
2012-11-15 18:20             ` Grant Likely
2012-11-15 18:31               ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-11-20 22:00                 ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A5350A.3070109@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox