Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86: ramdisk info print with high bits.

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

On 11/16/2012 12:53 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> ramdisk could be loaded high now for 64bit.
> 
> So need to print more digits for them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index c2eb535..0e13c6e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static void __init relocate_initrd(void)
>  	memblock_reserve(ramdisk_here, area_size);
>  	initrd_start = ramdisk_here + PAGE_OFFSET;
>  	initrd_end   = initrd_start + ramdisk_size;
> -	printk(KERN_INFO "Allocated new RAMDISK: [mem %#010llx-%#010llx]\n",
> +	printk(KERN_INFO "Allocated new RAMDISK: [mem %#018llx-%#018llx]\n",
>  			 ramdisk_here, ramdisk_here + ramdisk_size - 1);

NAK, this is expected to match the resource print format (%pR), which
prints 10 digits by default and then expands.  Furthermore, printing
*18* digits is downright silly since we still don't have 72-bit addressing.

	-hpa