linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com,
	deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, g.trinabh@gmail.com,
	linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, jwerner@chromium.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, snanda@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] cpuidle - remove the power_specified field in the driver
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:17:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A8A7BB.2070809@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A89F08.7020307@gmail.com>

On 11/18/2012 09:40 AM, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/12/2012 09:26 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> This patch follows the discussion about reinitializing the power usage
>> when a C-state is added/removed.
>>
>>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/518
>>
>> We realized the power usage field is never filled and when it is
>> filled for tegra, the power_specified flag is not set making all these
>> values to be resetted when the driver is initialized with the set_power_state
>> function.
>>
>> Julius and I feel this is over-engineered and the power_specified
>> flag could be simply removed and continue assuming the states are
>> backward sorted.
>>
>> The menu governor select function is simplified as the power is ordered.
>> Actually the condition is always true with the current code.
>>
>> The cpuidle_play_dead function is also simplified by doing a reverse lookup
>> on the array.
>>
>> The set_power_states function is removed as it does no make sense anymore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c        |   17 ++++-------------
>>  drivers/cpuidle/driver.c         |   25 -------------------------
>>  drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c |    8 ++------
>>  include/linux/cpuidle.h          |    2 +-
>>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> index 711dd83..f983262 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> @@ -69,24 +69,15 @@ int cpuidle_play_dead(void)
>>  {
>>  	struct cpuidle_device *dev = __this_cpu_read(cpuidle_devices);
>>  	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev);
>> -	int i, dead_state = -1;
>> -	int power_usage = -1;
>> +	int i;
>>  
>>  	if (!drv)
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>  
>>  	/* Find lowest-power state that supports long-term idle */
>> -	for (i = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
>> -		struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
>> -
>> -		if (s->power_usage < power_usage && s->enter_dead) {
>> -			power_usage = s->power_usage;
>> -			dead_state = i;
>> -		}
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	if (dead_state != -1)
>> -		return drv->states[dead_state].enter_dead(dev, dead_state);
>> +	for (i = drv->state_count; i >= CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i--)
>> +		if (drv->states[i].play_dead)
> 
> I guess you meant drv->states[i].enter_dead

Yep :)



-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-18  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-16 22:39 [PATCH] cpuidle: reinitialize power_usage values when adding/removing C-states Julius Werner
2012-10-17 10:31 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-10-17 10:44   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-10-17 18:43   ` Julius Werner
2012-10-18  8:21     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-10-19 21:50       ` [PATCH] acpi/cpuidle: " Julius Werner
2012-10-20 21:50         ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-10-22 17:13           ` Julius Werner
2012-10-22 17:21             ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-11-12 20:26           ` [RFC] cpuidle - remove the power_specified field in the driver Daniel Lezcano
2012-11-12 21:09             ` Julius Werner
2012-11-12 22:08               ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-11-18  8:40             ` Francesco Lavra
2012-11-18  9:17               ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-12-10 19:09                 ` Julius Werner
2012-12-10 22:41                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-11  9:46                   ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A8A7BB.2070809@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=francescolavra.fl@gmail.com \
    --cc=g.trinabh@gmail.com \
    --cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=snanda@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).