From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753248Ab2KSWqe (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:46:34 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:35062 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750770Ab2KSWqd (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:46:33 -0500 Message-ID: <50AAB6AF.60806@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:46:07 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Lutomirski CC: Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, John Stultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 52/58] x86: vdso: Add prototypes for __vdso_* functions References: <1353302917-13995-1-git-send-email-josh@joshtriplett.org> <1353302917-13995-53-git-send-email-josh@joshtriplett.org> <20121119203716.GA5041@jtriplet-mobl1> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/19/2012 02:44 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski >>> >>> In theory, this could go in arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vdso.h. No one >>> cares, I suspect, since there exactly two non-test-case users that I >>> know of. >> >> If you think it makes sense to put the VDSO prototypes in that UAPI >> header, I could prepare an alternate patch that does so. > > That header doesn't actually exist. Feel free to create it if you're > feeling ambitious :) > It would indeed be good to separate out the UAPI for the vdso. -hpa