public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] x86: Add macro for 64bit entry startup_64
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:13:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AABD15.1050809@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQV=G=5zAqv7EiUnb=O7znxuieiCawfgomv9aPNwVAV4uQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/19/2012 02:53 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> We can't change the 0x200 value, ever, because there are already things
>> that use the 64-bit entry point.  As such, these macros and the bzImage
>> fields are pointless; let's not bother and instead document the 0x200 as
>> the permanently fixed address of the 64-bit entry point.
> 
> ok,
> 
> any other field, in header struct field that we can use to tell
> bzImage could be used that
> 0x200 directly?
> 
> hardware_subarch?
> 

There isn't one... this dates back all the way to the original x86-64
kernels.

Are you asking if we can tell this is a 64-bit kernel (as opposed to a
32-bit kernel, which obviously doesn't have a 64-bit entry point)?
Unfortunately there isn't an intentional one that I know of.  There
might be an accidental such indicator, but we'd have to go back to look
at 8+ years of kernels.  We can't even rely on a jmp instruction at the
address...

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-19 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-18  7:09 [PATCH v2 00/13] x86, boot, 64bit: Add support for loading ramdisk and bzImage high Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] x86, boot: move verify_cpu.S after 0x200 Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] x86, boot: Move lldt/ltr out of 64bit code section Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] x86: Add macro for 64bit entry startup_64 Yinghai Lu
2012-11-19 22:42   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-19 22:53     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-11-19 23:13       ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-11-19 23:46         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-11-19 23:55           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-20  0:39             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-11-20 19:20               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-11-20 20:44                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-20 20:55                   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-11-20 21:12                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-21  0:20                       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-11-21  0:28                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-21  0:32                           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-11-21  0:34                             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-11-21  0:45                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] x86, 64bit: set extra ident page table for whole kernel range Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] x86, 64bit: add support for loading kernel above 512G Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] x86: Merge early_reserve_initrd for 32bit and 64bit Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] x86: add get_ramdisk_image/size Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] x86, boot: add get_cmd_line_ptr() Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] x86, boot: Don't check if cmd_line_ptr is accessible in misc/decompressor() Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] x86, boot: update cmd_line_ptr to unsigned long Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] x86: use io_remap to access real_mode_data Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] x86, boot: add fields to support load bzImage and ramdisk high Yinghai Lu
2012-11-18  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] x86: remove 1024g limitation for kexec buffer on 64bit Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50AABD15.1050809@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox