linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, pjt@google.com,
	preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] enable runnable load avg in load balance
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:37:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B40B49.1070107@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xm26ehjg5gra.fsf@sword-of-the-dawn.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 11/27/2012 03:03 AM, Benjamin Segall wrote:
> So, I've been trying out using the runnable averages for load balance in
> a few ways, but haven't actually gotten any improvement on the
> benchmarks I've run. I'll post my patches once I have the numbers down,
> but it's generally been about half a percent to 1% worse on the tests
> I've tried.
> 
> The basic idea is to use (cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg +
> cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg) (which should be equivalent to doing
> load_avg_contrib on the rq) for cfs_rqs and possibly the rq, and
> p->se.load.weight * p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum / period for tasks.
> 
> I have not yet tried including wake_affine, so this has just involved
> h_load (task_load_down and task_h_load), as that makes everything
> (besides wake_affine) be based on either the new averages or the
> rq->cpu_load averages.
> 


which tree do your code base on? tip/master is changing quickly recently.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-27  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-17 13:04 [RFC PATCH 0/5] enable runnable load avg in load balance Alex Shi
2012-11-17 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] sched: get rq runnable load average for " Alex Shi
2012-11-17 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] sched: update rq runnable load average in time Alex Shi
2012-11-17 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] sched: using runnable load avg in cpu_load and cpu_avg_load_per_task Alex Shi
2012-11-17 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched: consider runnable load average in wake_affine and move_tasks Alex Shi
2012-11-17 18:09   ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-11-18  9:36     ` Alex Shi
2012-11-17 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] sched: revert 'Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency ...' Alex Shi
2012-11-17 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] enable runnable load avg in load balance Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
2012-11-17 19:12 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-11-18  8:35   ` Alex Shi
2012-11-26 19:03 ` Benjamin Segall
2012-11-27  0:37   ` Alex Shi [this message]
2012-11-27  1:01     ` Benjamin Segall
2012-11-27  1:11   ` Alex Shi
2012-11-27  3:08   ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-11-27  6:14     ` Alex Shi
2012-11-27  6:45       ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-11-27  8:06         ` Alex Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50B40B49.1070107@intel.com \
    --to=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).