From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753510Ab2LDJsH (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 04:48:07 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:44874 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751731Ab2LDJsB (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 04:48:01 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,370,1352044800"; d="scan'208";a="6330127" Message-ID: <50BDC694.1060509@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:47:00 +0800 From: Tang Chen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wen Congyang CC: x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes , Jiang Liu , Len Brown , benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, Christoph Lameter , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , KOSAKI Motohiro , Yasuaki Ishimatsu , Jianguo Wu Subject: Re: [Patch v4 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap of sparse-vmemmap References: <1354010422-19648-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <1354010422-19648-9-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <1354010422-19648-9-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2012/12/04 17:47:21, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2012/12/04 17:47:22, Serialize complete at 2012/12/04 17:47:22 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Wen Congyang wrote: > static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms) > { > unsigned long flags; > @@ -330,9 +317,9 @@ static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms) > pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat,&flags); > sparse_remove_one_section(zone, ms); > pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat,&flags); > - return 0; > + > + return ret; I think we don't need to change this line. :) Reviewed-by: Tang Chen