From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Alex Shi <lkml.alex@gmail.com>
Cc: npiggin@kernel.dk, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched: fork/exec/wake clean up
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:33:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C13960.5010901@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGjg+kE9dFSfnridN_5ngtuC1r5rbnkLVfyqkdTwWCE0LOG4OQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/05/2012 03:09 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote:
>> This patchset try to clean up select_task_rq_fair which used for
>> fork/exec/wake scheduling.
>>
>> With this patchset, our system NHM EX and SNB EP 4 socket machine
>> has 10% hackbench performance increase.
>
> Any comments for this patchset?
Nick & Ingo:
Would you like to give some comments for this?
CC to more experts :)
Thanks!
Alex
>>
>> Regards
>> Alex
>>
>> [PATCH 01/4] sched: select_task_rq_fair clean up
>> [PATCH 02/4] sched: fix find_idlest_group mess logical
>> [PATCH 03/4] sched: don't need go to smaller sched domain
>> [PATCH 04/4] sched: remove domain iterations in fork/exec/wake
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-03 13:54 [PATCH 0/4] sched: fork/exec/wake clean up Alex Shi
2012-12-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] sched: select_task_rq_fair " Alex Shi
2012-12-06 17:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-12-07 0:31 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-07 1:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-12-07 1:22 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] sched: fix find_idlest_group mess logical Alex Shi
2012-12-07 0:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-12-07 1:32 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-07 8:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-12-08 12:12 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] sched: don't need go to smaller sched domain Alex Shi
2012-12-03 13:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] sched: remove domain iterations in fork/exec/wake Alex Shi
2012-12-05 7:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched: fork/exec/wake clean up Alex Shi
2012-12-07 0:33 ` Alex Shi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C13960.5010901@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml.alex@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).