[Consult]: Re: [PATCH] synclink fix ldisc buffer argument

[Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>]

Hello Paul Fulghum:

  Firstly, sorry for my mistake:
    I am a reporter (not reviewer), and not suitable to review maintainer's patch.
    when you send relative patch, need not cc to me (I am not reviewer)

  so:
    could you send patch again (not need cc to me) ?
      (and also it is better to mark me as Reported-by in your patch)

  sorry for my mistake, again.

gchen.


于 2012年12月07日 10:15, Chen Gang 写道:
> Hello Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> 
> 
> 于 2012年12月04日 01:13, Paul Fulghum 写道:
>> Fix call to line discipline receive_buf by synclink drivers.
>> Dummy flag buffer argument is ignored by N_HDLC line discipline but might
>> be of insufficient size if accessed by a different line discipline
>> selected by mistake. flag buffer allocation now matches max size of data
>> buffer. Unused char_buf buffers are removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>
> 
> if no additional questions:
>   is it suitable to let this patch pass checking ?
>   at least for me, it is surely solve an issue, and no negative effect.
> 
> now, maybe Paul Fulghum is busy...
>   the left questions what I have sent seems minor.
>   so they can be delayed, until he has free time.
> 
> when Paul Fulghum has free time.
>   can still check what my left questions whether valid.
>   if they are valid, can send additional patch for them.
> 
> 
>   is it OK ?
> 
>   Regards
> 


-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation