From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750995Ab2LJBbd (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2012 20:31:33 -0500 Received: from intranet.asianux.com ([58.214.24.6]:17647 "EHLO intranet.asianux.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750754Ab2LJBb2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2012 20:31:28 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -100.8 Message-ID: <50C53BA5.2030805@asianux.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:32:21 +0800 From: Chen Gang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Fulghum CC: Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Subject: [Consult]: Re: [PATCH] synclink fix ldisc buffer argument References: <50B6E751.9000000@asianux.com> <20121129051335.GA4375@kroah.com> <50B6F967.3050000@asianux.com> <20121129183207.GA4688@kroah.com> <50B81F76.8020508@asianux.com> <50B8DDAC.8070901@microgate.com> <50B90D0D.9040401@microgate.com> <50BCDDB4.6010608@microgate.com> <50C1513A.4010600@asianux.com> In-Reply-To: <50C1513A.4010600@asianux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Paul Fulghum: Firstly, sorry for my mistake: I am a reporter (not reviewer), and not suitable to review maintainer's patch. when you send relative patch, need not cc to me (I am not reviewer) so: could you send patch again (not need cc to me) ? (and also it is better to mark me as Reported-by in your patch) sorry for my mistake, again. gchen. 于 2012年12月07日 10:15, Chen Gang 写道: > Hello Greg Kroah-Hartman: > > > 于 2012年12月04日 01:13, Paul Fulghum 写道: >> Fix call to line discipline receive_buf by synclink drivers. >> Dummy flag buffer argument is ignored by N_HDLC line discipline but might >> be of insufficient size if accessed by a different line discipline >> selected by mistake. flag buffer allocation now matches max size of data >> buffer. Unused char_buf buffers are removed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Fulghum > > if no additional questions: > is it suitable to let this patch pass checking ? > at least for me, it is surely solve an issue, and no negative effect. > > now, maybe Paul Fulghum is busy... > the left questions what I have sent seems minor. > so they can be delayed, until he has free time. > > when Paul Fulghum has free time. > can still check what my left questions whether valid. > if they are valid, can send additional patch for them. > > > is it OK ? > > Regards > -- Chen Gang Asianux Corporation