From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755601Ab2LMCxp (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:53:45 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:10411 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754941Ab2LMCxo (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:53:44 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,270,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="230828089" Message-ID: <50C942AE.6010102@intel.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:51:26 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vincent Guittot CC: Alex Shi , Amit Kucheria , Arjan van de Ven , Borislav Petkov , rob@landley.net, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, andre.przywara@amd.com, rjw@sisk.pl, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pjt@google.com, Preeti U Murthy Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/18] sched: simplified fork, enable load average into LB and power awareness scheduling References: <1355127754-8444-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <50C722AC.3080806@intel.com> <20121211154819.GC8873@liondog.tnic> <50C75935.1040004@linux.intel.com> <20121211161320.GA28827@liondog.tnic> <50C76208.107@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/12/2012 10:21 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: >>> >> If Linux is to continue to work efficiently on heterogeneous >>> >> multi-processing platforms, it needs to provide scheduling mechanisms >>> >> that can be exploited as per the demands of the HW architecture. >> > >> > Linus definitely disagree such ideas. :) So, need to summaries the >> > logical beyond all hardware. >> > >>> >> example is the "small task packing (and spreading)" for which Vincent >>> >> Guittot has posted a patchset[1] earlier and so has Alex now. >> > >> > Sure. I just thought my patchset should handled the 'small task >> > packing' scenario. Could you guy like to have a try? > Hi Alex, > > Yes, I will do a try with your patchset when i will have some spare time Thanks Vincent! the balance and powersaving policy should have effect.