Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT] regulator: core: Fix continuous_voltage_range case in regulator_can_change_voltage

[Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>]

Hello,

On 12/12/2012 2:22 AM, Axel Lin wrote:
> Regulator drivers with continuous_voltage_range flag set allows not setting
> n_voltages. Thus if continuous_voltage_range is set, check the constraint range
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> ---
>   drivers/regulator/core.c |   12 +++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 0f65b24..d7448ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -1885,9 +1885,15 @@ int regulator_can_change_voltage(struct regulator *regulator)
>   	struct regulator_dev	*rdev = regulator->rdev;
>
>   	if (rdev->constraints &&
> -	    rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE &&
> -	    (rdev->desc->n_voltages - rdev->desc->linear_min_sel) > 1)
> -		return 1;
> +	    (rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE)) {
> +		if (rdev->desc->n_voltages - rdev->desc->linear_min_sel > 1)
> +			return 1;
> +
> +		if (rdev->desc->continuous_voltage_range &&
> +		    rdev->constraints->min_uV && rdev->constraints->max_uV &&
> +		    rdev->constraints->min_uV != rdev->constraints->max_uV)
> +			return 1;
> +	}
>
>   	return 0;
>   }
>

This change looks reasonable, I've missed the fact that there is a
support for regulators with continuous voltage range. This change also
shows that the n_voltages based workaround used earlier by mmc core was
indeed only a hack and regulator_can_change_voltage() approach is much
cleaner solution.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center