linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:50:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50CAB001.2040106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121213225408.GB11385@amt.cnet>

On 12/14/2012 06:54 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 04:05:55AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 12/12/2012 07:36 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:11:35PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>> Changelog:
>>>> There are some changes from Marcelo and Gleb's review, thank you all!
>>>> - access indirect_shadow_pages in the protection of mmu-lock
>>>> - fix the issue when unhandleable instruction access on large page
>>>> - add a new test case for large page
>>>>
>>>> The current reexecute_instruction can not well detect the failed instruction
>>>> emulation. It allows guest to retry all the instructions except it accesses
>>>> on error pfn.
>>>>
>>>> For example, these cases can not be detected:
>>>> - for tdp used
>>>>   currently, it refused to retry all instructions. If nested npt is used, the
>>>>   emulation may be caused by shadow page, it can be fixed by unshadow the
>>>>   shadow page.
>>>>
>>>> - for shadow mmu
>>>>   some cases are nested-write-protect, for example, if the page we want to
>>>>   write is used as PDE but it chains to itself. Under this case, we should
>>>>   stop the emulation and report the case to userspace.
>>>>
>>>> There are two test cases based on kvm-unit-test can trigger a infinite loop on
>>>> current code (ept = 0), after this patchset, it can report the error to Qemu.
>>>>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] access test: test unhandleable instruction
>>>>
>>>> Test the instruction which can not be handled by kvm
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Please submit the test for inclusion. There should be some way to make
>>> it fail.. 
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> But it is not easy. If the test cases run normally, kvm will report a error to Qemu
>> then Qemu will exit the vcpu thread after dumping the vcpu state.
>>
>> We need to do something to let guest can be aware that the error report is triggered.
>> I guess we can add a option in Qemu, say '-notify-guest' and allow Qemu to inject #GP
>> to guest with a special ERROR_CODE if error is reported.
>>
>>> program a timer interrupt and #GP? 
>>
>> Could you please explain the detail?
> 
> Before the instruction which writes continuously to the pagetable, arm
> say lapic timer. #GP on the interrupt handler and test with failure.

Sorry, I am confused about this. After Qemu exits due to KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR,
the vm is stopped then interrupt can not be injected to guest. Or i missed something?




  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-14  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-10  9:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-10  9:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: MMU: move adjusting pte access for softmmu to FNAME(page_fault) Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-11 23:47   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-12 18:53     ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-10  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: MMU: adjust page size early if gfn used as page table Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-12  0:57   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-12 19:23     ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-13 22:37       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-10  9:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: x86: clean up reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-10  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86: let reexecute_instruction work for tdp Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-10  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-12  1:09   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-12 19:29     ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-13 23:02       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-14  3:40         ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-11 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-12 20:05   ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-12-13 22:54     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-14  4:50       ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-12-15  1:05         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-12-23 11:46           ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50CAB001.2040106@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).