From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753901Ab2LQVoW (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:44:22 -0500 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:39869 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753215Ab2LQVoV (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:44:21 -0500 Message-ID: <50CF9233.3010506@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:44:19 -0700 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laxman Dewangan CC: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: tegra: add connection name for uart clock table References: <1355746101-15291-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1355746101-15291-3-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <1355746101-15291-3-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/17/2012 05:08 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Add connection name "uart-clk" for the uart clock information. Does the UART receive more than one clock, so that it actually cares what the clock connection name is? If not, can we just drop this patch?