From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754899Ab2LRXco (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:32:44 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]:59490 "EHLO mail-bk0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753683Ab2LRXck (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:32:40 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 807 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:32:40 EST Message-ID: <50D0FD13.5060508@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:32:35 +0100 From: Sylwester Nawrocki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120412 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Gautam CC: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, balbi@ti.com, thomas.abraham@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, p.paneri@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy driver References: <1355845182-14104-1-git-send-email-gautam.vivek@samsung.com> <1355845182-14104-3-git-send-email-gautam.vivek@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <1355845182-14104-3-git-send-email-gautam.vivek@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/18/2012 04:39 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Adding base address information required for enabling > USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC. > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > @@ -316,7 +316,8 @@ > > usbphy@12130000 { > compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbphy"; > - reg =<0x12130000 0x100>; > + reg =<0x12130000 0x100>, > + <0x12100000 0x100>; Doesn't this second memory region mean distinct PHY controller device ? Why separate usbphy node can't/shouldn't be created for it ? > samsung,usb-phyhandle =<&phy_h0&phy_h1&phy_h2>; > samsung,enable-mask =<1>; > };