Re: [PATCH] timekeeping: avoid adjust kernel time once hwclock kept in UTC time

[John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>]

On 12/18/2012 09:15 PM, Dong Zhu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:03:34PM +0800, Dong Zhu wrote:
>>  From c126376cf1837b0956e0268056db61870fbbc1d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Dong Zhu <bluezhudong@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:45:00 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: avoid adjust kernel time once hwclock kept in
>>   UTC time
>>
>> If the Hardware Clock kept in local time,kernel will adjust the time
>> to be UTC time.But if Hardware Clock kept in UTC time,system will make
>> a dummy settimeofday call first (sys_tz.tz_minuteswest = 0) to make sure
>> the time is not shifted,so at this point I think maybe it is not necessary
>> to set the kernel time once the sys_tz.tz_minuteswest is zero.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dong Zhu <bluezhudong@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/time.c | 8 +++++---
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/time.c b/kernel/time.c
>> index d226c6a..0b592ce 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time.c
>> @@ -134,9 +134,11 @@ static inline void warp_clock(void)
>>   {
>>   	struct timespec adjust;
>>   
>> -	adjust = current_kernel_time();
>> -	adjust.tv_sec += sys_tz.tz_minuteswest * 60;
>> -	do_settimeofday(&adjust);
>> +	if (sys_tz.tz_minuteswest) {
>> +		adjust = current_kernel_time();
>> +		adjust.tv_sec += sys_tz.tz_minuteswest * 60;
>> +		do_settimeofday(&adjust);
>> +	}
>>   }
>>   
>>   /*
>> -- 
>> 1.7.11.7
>>
> Hi,
>
> Any comments ?
Sorry for the slow response, been a little busy.   Honestly the 
warp_clock() code path is always been a bit odd to me, so I've not 
really been able to get my head around the implications of this change.

Really, I'm not sure if I'll get to this before the new year.
Its on my list, but don't be afraid to ping me early Jan if I haven't 
queued it for 3.9 by then.

thanks
-john