From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: fabio.baltieri@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] Fix problem with cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:39:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50DF0EA4.8090603@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2035804.da5iyiYDGE@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 12/29/2012 07:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, December 28, 2012 07:55:20 PM Larry Finger wrote:
>> Since commit 2aacdff entitled "cpufreq: Move common part from governors
>> to separate file", whenever the drivers that depend on this new file
>> (cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative) are built as modules, a new
>> module named cpufreq_governor is created because the Makefile includes
>> cpufreq_governor.o twice. As drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c contains no
>> MODULE directives, the resulting module has no license specified, which
>> results in logging of a "module license 'unspecified' taints kernel". In
>> addition, a number of globals are exported GPL only, and are therefore
>> not available. This fix establishes a new boolean configuration variable
>> that forces cpufreq_governor.o to be linked into the kernel whenever
>> either cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative is selected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>> ---
>> V3 changes only Kconfig and Makefile and avoids creating a new module.
>
> OK, thanks for the patch!
>
> If you don't mind, I'll rename CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOVERNOR to
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON when applying it, though.
No problem. It occurred to me that if one can do logic in a Makefile, then the
extra configuration variable can be eliminated. I still need to check if that is
possible.
Larry
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
>> Kconfig | 5 +++++
>> Makefile | 5 +++--
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
>> ===================================================================
>> --- wireless-testing-new.orig/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
>> +++ wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
>> @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ if CPU_FREQ
>> config CPU_FREQ_TABLE
>> tristate
>>
>> +config CPU_FREQ_GOVERNOR
>> + bool
>> +
>> config CPU_FREQ_STAT
>> tristate "CPU frequency translation statistics"
>> select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
>> @@ -141,6 +144,7 @@ config CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE
>> config CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND
>> tristate "'ondemand' cpufreq policy governor"
>> select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
>> + select CPU_FREQ_GOVERNOR
>> help
>> 'ondemand' - This driver adds a dynamic cpufreq policy governor.
>> The governor does a periodic polling and
>> @@ -159,6 +163,7 @@ config CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND
>> config CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
>> tristate "'conservative' cpufreq governor"
>> depends on CPU_FREQ
>> + select CPU_FREQ_GOVERNOR
>> help
>> 'conservative' - this driver is rather similar to the 'ondemand'
>> governor both in its source code and its purpose, the difference is
>> Index: wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- wireless-testing-new.orig/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> +++ wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> @@ -7,8 +7,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT)
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE) += cpufreq_performance.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE) += cpufreq_powersave.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE) += cpufreq_userspace.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND) += cpufreq_ondemand.o cpufreq_governor.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE) += cpufreq_conservative.o cpufreq_governor.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND) += cpufreq_ondemand.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE) += cpufreq_conservative.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOVERNOR) += cpufreq_governor.o
>>
>> # CPUfreq cross-arch helpers
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE) += freq_table.o
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-29 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-29 1:55 [PATCH V3] Fix problem with cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative Larry Finger
2012-12-29 13:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-29 15:39 ` Larry Finger [this message]
2012-12-29 17:24 ` Larry Finger
2012-12-29 21:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-02 3:57 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50DF0EA4.8090603@lwfinger.net \
--to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=fabio.baltieri@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox